Bernard L, Leroux C, Chilliard Y
Adipose Tissue and Milk Lipid Laboratory, Herbivore Research Unit, INRA-Theix, 63 122 St Genès-Champanelle, France.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;606:67-108. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74087-4_2.
The effect of nutrition on milk fat yield and composition has largely been investigated in cows and goats, with some differences for fatty acid (FA) composition responses and marked species differences in milk fat yield response. Recently, the characterization of lipogenic genes in ruminant species allowed in vivo studies focused on the effect of nutrition on mammary expression of these genes, in cows (mainly fed milk fat-depressing diets) and goats (fed lipid-supplemented diets). These few studies demonstrated some similarities in the regulation of gene expression between the two species, although the responses were not always in agreement with milk FA secretion responses. A central role for trans-10 C18:1 and trans-10, cis-12 CLA as regulators of milk fat synthesis has been proposed. However, trans-10 C18:1 does not directly control milk fat synthesis in cows, despite the fact that it largely responds to dietary factors, with its concentration being negatively correlated with milk fat yield response in cows and, to a lesser extent, in goats. Milk trans-10, cis-12 CLA is often correlated with milk fat depression in cows but not in goats and, when postruminally infused, acts as an inhibitor of the expression of key lipogenic genes in cows. Recent evidence has also proven the inhibitory effect of the trans-9, cis-11 CLA isomer. The molecular mechanisms by which nutrients regulate lipogenic gene expression have yet to be well identified, but a central role for SREBP-1 has been outlined as mediator of FA effects, whereas the roles of PPARs and STAT5 need to be determined. It is expected that the development of in vitro functional systems for lipid synthesis and secretion will allow future progress toward (1) the identification of the inhibitors and activators of fat synthesis, (2) the knowledge of cellular mechanisms, and (3) the understanding of differences between ruminant species.
营养对奶牛和奶山羊乳脂肪产量及组成的影响已得到大量研究,脂肪酸(FA)组成反应存在一些差异,且乳脂肪产量反应存在显著的物种差异。最近,反刍动物脂肪生成基因的特性使得体内研究能够聚焦于营养对这些基因在奶牛(主要饲喂降低乳脂肪的日粮)和奶山羊(饲喂补充脂质的日粮)乳腺表达的影响。这些为数不多的研究表明,两个物种在基因表达调控方面存在一些相似之处,尽管反应并不总是与乳脂肪酸分泌反应一致。有人提出反式-10 C18:1和反式-10,顺式-12共轭亚油酸(CLA)在乳脂肪合成调节中起核心作用。然而,反式-10 C18:1并不直接控制奶牛的乳脂肪合成,尽管它在很大程度上对日粮因素有反应,其浓度与奶牛的乳脂肪产量反应呈负相关,在奶山羊中相关性较小。奶牛乳中的反式-10,顺式-12 CLA通常与乳脂肪降低有关,但在奶山羊中并非如此,并且当瘤胃后灌注时,它会抑制奶牛关键脂肪生成基因的表达。最近的证据也证明了反式-9,顺式-11 CLA异构体的抑制作用。营养物质调节脂肪生成基因表达的分子机制尚未完全明确,但已概述了固醇调节元件结合蛋白-1(SREBP-1)作为脂肪酸效应介质的核心作用,而过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPARs)和信号转导子和转录激活子5(STAT5)的作用尚待确定。预计用于脂质合成和分泌的体外功能系统的开发将推动未来在以下方面取得进展:(1)鉴定脂肪合成的抑制剂和激活剂;(2)了解细胞机制;(3)理解反刍动物物种之间的差异。