Jenkins R, Bhugra D, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Farrell M, Coid J, Fryers T, Weich S, Singleton N, Meltzer H
WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
Psychol Med. 2008 Oct;38(10):1485-93. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002516. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
The association between poor mental health and poverty is well known but its mechanism is not fully understood. This study tests the hypothesis that the association between low income and mental disorder is mediated by debt and its attendant financial hardship.
The study is a cross-sectional nationally representative survey of private households in England, Scotland and Wales, which assessed 8580 participants aged 16-74 years living in general households. Psychosis, neurosis, alcohol abuse and drug abuse were identified by the Clinical Interview Schedule--Revised, the Schedule for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and other measures. Detailed questions were asked about income, debt and financial hardship.
Those with low income were more likely to have mental disorder [odds ratio (OR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68-2.59] but this relationship was attenuated after adjustment for debt (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.25-1.97) and vanished when other sociodemographic variables were also controlled (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.77-1.48). Of those with mental disorder, 23% were in debt (compared with 8% of those without disorder), and 10% had had a utility disconnected (compared with 3%). The more debts people had, the more likely they were to have some form of mental disorder, even after adjustment for income and other sociodemographic variables. People with six or more separate debts had a six-fold increase in mental disorder after adjustment for income (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.5-10.3).
Both low income and debt are associated with mental illness, but the effect of income appears to be mediated largely by debt.
心理健康状况不佳与贫困之间的关联已广为人知,但其机制尚未完全明晰。本研究旨在检验以下假设:低收入与精神障碍之间的关联是由债务及其带来的经济困难所介导的。
该研究是一项针对英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士私人家庭的全国代表性横断面调查,评估了8580名年龄在16 - 74岁的普通家庭住户。通过修订版临床访谈问卷、神经精神病学评估量表(SCAN)、酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)及其他方法来识别精神病、神经症、酒精滥用和药物滥用情况。还询问了有关收入、债务和经济困难的详细问题。
低收入者患精神障碍的可能性更大[优势比(OR)为2.09,95%置信区间(CI)为1.68 - 2.59],但在对债务进行调整后,这种关系有所减弱(OR为1.58,95% CI为1.25 - 1.97),而当同时控制其他社会人口统计学变量时,这种关系消失了(OR为1.07,95% CI为0.77 - 1.48)。在患有精神障碍的人群中,23%有债务(无精神障碍者中这一比例为8%),10%的水电供应被切断(无精神障碍者中这一比例为3%)。即使在对收入和其他社会人口统计学变量进行调整后,人们的债务越多,患某种形式精神障碍的可能性就越大。在对收入进行调整后,有六项或更多独立债务的人患精神障碍的几率增加了六倍(OR为6.0,95% CI为3.5 - 10.3)。
低收入和债务都与精神疾病有关,但收入的影响似乎主要由债务介导。