Visco Anthony G, Brubaker Linda, Nygaard Ingrid, Richter Holly E, Cundiff Geoffrey, Fine Paul, Zyczynski Halina, Brown Morton B, Weber Anne M
Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3192, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 May;19(5):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
The aim of this study is to describe results of reduction testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy and to estimate whether stress leakage during urodynamic testing with prolapse reduction predicts postoperative stress incontinence. Three hundred twenty-two stress-continent women with stages II-IV prolapse underwent standardized urodynamics. Five prolapse reduction methods were tested: two at each site and both performed for each subject. Clinicians were masked to urodynamic results. At sacrocolpopexy, participants were randomized to Burch colposuspension or no Burch (control). P-values were computed by two-tailed Fisher's exact test or t-test. Preoperatively, only 12 of 313 (3.7%) subjects demonstrated urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) without prolapse reduction. More women leaked after the second method than after the first (22% vs. 16%; p = 0.012). Preoperative detection of USI with prolapse reduction at 300ml was pessary, 6% (5 of 88); manual, 16% (19 of 122); forceps, 21% (21 of 98); swab, 20% (32 of 158); and speculum, 30% (35 of 118). Women who demonstrated preoperative USI during prolapse reduction were more likely to report postoperative stress incontinence, regardless of concomitant colposuspension (controls 58% vs. 38% (p = 0.04) and Burch 32% vs. 21% (p = 0.19)). In stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy, few women demonstrated USI without prolapse reduction. Detection rates of USI with prolapse reduction varied significantly by reduction method. Preoperative USI leakage during reduction testing is associated with a higher risk for postoperative stress incontinence at 3 months. Future research is warranted in this patient population to evaluate other treatment options to refine predictions and further reduce the risk of postoperative stress incontinence.
本研究的目的是描述接受骶骨阴道固定术的压力性尿失禁患者的复位测试结果,并评估在脱垂复位的尿动力学测试期间的压力性漏尿是否可预测术后压力性尿失禁。322例II-IV期脱垂的压力性尿失禁患者接受了标准化尿动力学检查。测试了五种脱垂复位方法:每个部位两种,每位受试者均进行这两种方法。临床医生对尿动力学结果不知情。在骶骨阴道固定术中,参与者被随机分为Burch阴道悬吊术组或无Burch阴道悬吊术组(对照组)。P值通过双尾Fisher精确检验或t检验计算。术前,313例受试者中只有12例(3.7%)在未进行脱垂复位时表现出尿动力学压力性尿失禁(USI)。采用第二种方法后漏尿的女性比第一种方法后更多(22%对16%;p=0.012)。术前在300ml脱垂复位时检测到USI的方法中,子宫托法为6%(88例中的5例);手法复位法为16%(122例中的19例);镊子法为21%(98例中的21例);拭子法为20%(158例中的32例);窥器法为30%(118例中的35例)。在脱垂复位期间表现出术前USI的女性更有可能报告术后压力性尿失禁,无论是否同时进行阴道悬吊术(对照组58%对38%(p=0.04),Burch阴道悬吊术组32%对21%(p=0.19))。在接受骶骨阴道固定术的压力性尿失禁女性中,很少有女性在未进行脱垂复位时表现出USI。不同复位方法导致的USI检出率差异显著。复位测试期间的术前USI漏尿与术后3个月压力性尿失禁的较高风险相关。有必要对该患者群体进行进一步研究,以评估其他治疗选择,优化预测并进一步降低术后压力性尿失禁的风险。