Rösner Susanne, Leucht Stefan, Lehert Philippe, Soyka Michael
IFT, Institut für Therapieforschung, Munich, Germany.
J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jan;22(1):11-23. doi: 10.1177/0269881107078308.
Two pharmacological agents have repeatedly been shown to be efficacious for relapse prevention in alcohol dependence: The putative glutamate-antagonist acamprosate and the opioid-antagonist naltrexone. Clinical evidence for both drugs is based on various outcome criteria. Whereas for acamprosate primarily abstinence maintenance has been demonstrated, studies with naltrexone have mostly emphasised the prevention of heavy drinking. The remaining effects of both drugs are not always reported; accordingly the corresponding database is fragmentary. Thus, the primary objective of the present meta-analysis was to complete the efficacy profiles for acamprosate and naltrexone and to compare them with each other. Unreported results, requested from the study investigators and the drug manufacturers, were integrated in the computation of effect sizes. For the meta-analysis, emphasis was placed on the conceptual distinction between having a first drink and returning to heavy drinking. Naltrexone was found to have a significant effect on the maintenance of abstinence as well as the prevention of heavy drinking. Acamprosate was shown only to support abstinence; it did not influence alcohol consumption after the first drink. When the efficacy profiles of the two drugs were compared, acamprosate was found to be more effective in preventing a lapse, whereas naltrexone was better in preventing a lapse from becoming a relapse. The superiority of either one drug or over the other one cannot be determined as a general rule, it rather depends on the therapeutic target. Benefits in the treatment of alcohol dependence might be optimized by matching the efficacy profiles of specific antidipsotropics with the motivational status of alcohol-dependent patients.
假定的谷氨酸拮抗剂阿坎酸和阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮。这两种药物的临床证据都基于各种结果标准。阿坎酸主要证明能维持戒酒状态,而纳曲酮的研究大多强调预防大量饮酒。两种药物的其他效果并不总是被报告;因此相应的数据库是不完整的。因此,本荟萃分析的主要目的是完善阿坎酸和纳曲酮的疗效概况,并相互比较。从研究调查人员和药品制造商处获取的未报告结果被纳入效应大小的计算中。在荟萃分析中,重点放在首次饮酒和恢复大量饮酒之间的概念区别上。发现纳曲酮对维持戒酒状态以及预防大量饮酒有显著效果。阿坎酸仅显示能支持戒酒;它对首次饮酒后的酒精摄入量没有影响。当比较两种药物的疗效概况时,发现阿坎酸在预防复饮方面更有效,而纳曲酮在防止复饮演变为复发方面更好。一般来说,无法确定一种药物比另一种药物更具优势,这更多取决于治疗目标。通过使特定抗酒瘾药物的疗效概况与酒精依赖患者的动机状态相匹配,可能会优化酒精依赖治疗的益处。