a Department of Psychology , University of California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
b Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine University of California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(2):124-140. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2018.1528265. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and its associated consequences remain significant public health concerns. Given that AUD represents a spectrum of severity, treatment options represent a continuum of care, ranging from single-session brief interventions to more intensive, prolonged, and specialized treatment modalities.
This qualitative literature review seeks to describe the best practices for AUD by placing a particular emphasis on identifying those practices which have received the most empirical support.
This review summarizes psychological and pharmacological intervention options for AUD treatment, with a focus on the relapse prevention phase of recovery. Psychological and pharmacological treatments are summarized in terms of the empirical evidence favoring each approach and the level of AUD severity for which they are most indicated.
One of the broad assertions from this review is that while AUD is highly prevalent, seeking treatment for AUD is not. There are a myriad of behavioral and pharmacological treatments that have shown compelling evidence of efficacy for the treatment of AUD. In the behavioral treatment literature, cognitive behavioral therapy has received the most consistent support. Opioid antagonism (via naltrexone) has been the most widely studied pharmacotherapy and has produced moderate effect sizes. While none of the treatments reviewed herein represents a so-called silver bullet for AUD, they each have the potential to significantly improve the odds of recovery. Precision medicine, or the identification of best treatment matches for individual patients, looms as an important overarching goal for the field, although specific matches are not yet sufficiently reliable in their empirical evidence to warrant clinical dissemination.
酒精使用障碍(AUD)及其相关后果仍然是重大的公共卫生问题。鉴于 AUD 代表了严重程度的连续谱,治疗选择代表了连续的护理范围,从单次短暂干预到更密集、更持久和专门的治疗模式。
本定性文献综述旨在描述 AUD 的最佳实践,特别强调确定那些得到最多经验支持的实践。
本综述总结了 AUD 治疗的心理和药理学干预选择,重点是康复的复发预防阶段。根据每种方法的实证证据和最适合的 AUD 严重程度,对心理和药理学治疗进行了总结。
从本次综述中得出的一个广泛主张是,尽管 AUD 非常普遍,但寻求 AUD 治疗的人并不多。有许多行为和药理学治疗方法已经证明对 AUD 治疗具有令人信服的疗效。在行为治疗文献中,认知行为疗法得到了最一致的支持。阿片类拮抗剂(纳曲酮)是研究最多的药物治疗方法,产生了中等的效果大小。虽然本文综述中没有一种治疗方法被称为 AUD 的所谓银弹,但它们都有可能显著提高康复的几率。精准医学,或为个体患者确定最佳治疗匹配,是该领域的一个重要总体目标,尽管特定的匹配在其经验证据中还不够可靠,无法保证临床推广。