• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较局部固定复方强化万古霉素-阿米卡星(VA 溶液)与常规单独治疗细菌性角膜溃疡的疗效。

Comparison of topical fixed-combination fortified vancomycin-amikacin (VA solution) to conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):294-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703078. Epub 2008 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1038/sj.eye.6703078
PMID:18188174
Abstract

PURPOSE

In an in vitro study, fixed-combination fortified vancomycin and amikacin ophthalmic solutions (VA solution) had the same potency and stable physical properties as the separate components. In this retrospective clinical study, we evaluated the efficacy of the topical VA solution in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer and comparison with separate topical fortified vancomycin and amikacin.

METHODS

Separate topical fortified eye drops was used prior to January 2004 and switched to the VA solution afterwards in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer. The medical records of 223 patients diagnosed with bacterial corneal ulcers between January 2002 and December 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 122 patients in the VA group and 101 in the separate group. Cure was defined as complete healing of the ulcer accompanied by a nonprogressive stromal infiltrate on two consecutive visits.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the VA and separate therapy group. The mean treatment duration was 15.4 days in the VA group and 16.1 days in the separate therapy group. The average hospital stay was 5.4 days (VA) and 7.2 days (separate antibiotics). Stromal infiltration regressed significantly without further expansion in both groups. All corneal ulcers completely re-epithelialized without complications related to drugs.

CONCLUSION

VA solution provided similar efficacy to the conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers; however, it is more convenient and tolerable, promotes patient's compliance, avoids the washout effect, and reduces nurse utilization. Hence, VA solution is a good alternative to separate therapy.

摘要

目的

在一项体外研究中,固定剂量联合强化万古霉素和阿米卡星滴眼液(VA 溶液)与单独成分具有相同的效力和稳定的物理性质。在这项回顾性临床研究中,我们评估了局部应用 VA 溶液治疗细菌性角膜溃疡的疗效,并与单独局部应用强化万古霉素和阿米卡星进行了比较。

方法

在 2004 年 1 月之前,单独使用局部强化滴眼液治疗细菌性角膜溃疡,之后改用 VA 溶液。回顾性分析 2002 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月间诊断为细菌性角膜溃疡的 223 例患者的病历。VA 组 122 例,单独组 101 例。治愈定义为溃疡完全愈合,两次连续就诊时基质浸润无进展。

结果

VA 组与单独治疗组之间无显著差异。VA 组的平均治疗时间为 15.4 天,单独治疗组为 16.1 天。VA 组的平均住院时间为 5.4 天,单独抗生素组为 7.2 天。两组基质浸润均明显消退,无进一步扩大。所有角膜溃疡均完全再上皮化,无与药物相关的并发症。

结论

VA 溶液在治疗细菌性角膜溃疡方面与常规单独治疗疗效相似,但更方便、耐受性更好,可提高患者的依从性,避免冲洗作用,减少护士的使用。因此,VA 溶液是单独治疗的良好替代药物。

相似文献

1
Comparison of topical fixed-combination fortified vancomycin-amikacin (VA solution) to conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer.比较局部固定复方强化万古霉素-阿米卡星(VA 溶液)与常规单独治疗细菌性角膜溃疡的疗效。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):294-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703078. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
2
Clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin in the treatment of bacterial keratitis: a randomized clinical trial.莫西沙星治疗细菌性角膜炎的临床疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Sep;114(9):1622-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.011.
3
Comparison of topical 0.3% ofloxacin with fortified tobramycin plus cefazolin in the treatment of bacterial keratitis.0.3%氧氟沙星局部用药与强化妥布霉素加头孢唑林治疗细菌性角膜炎的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1999 Dec;13 ( Pt 6):744-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1999.220.
4
Randomized clinical study for comparative evaluation of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones with the combination of fortified antibiotics in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers.随机临床研究比较评估第四代氟喹诺酮类药物与强化抗生素联合治疗细菌性角膜溃疡。
Cornea. 2010 Jul;29(7):751-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca2ba3.
5
Comparative efficacy of topical gatifloxacin with ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and clarithromycin in the treatment of experimental Mycobacterium chelonae keratitis.局部应用加替沙星与环丙沙星、阿米卡星和克拉霉素治疗实验性龟分枝杆菌角膜炎的疗效比较
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;122(8):1166-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.8.1166.
6
Evaluation of moxifloxacin 0.5% in treatment of nonperforated bacterial corneal ulcers: a randomized controlled trial.评价莫西沙星 0.5%治疗非穿孔性细菌性角膜溃疡:一项随机对照试验。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Jun;120(6):1173-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
7
Amniotic membrane transplantation in severe bacterial keratitis.羊膜移植治疗严重细菌性角膜炎
Cornea. 2007 Jan;26(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802b28df.
8
Nocardia keratitis: species, drug sensitivities, and clinical correlation.诺卡菌性角膜炎:菌种、药物敏感性及临床相关性。
Cornea. 2007 Apr;26(3):255-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318033d853.
9
Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. Report from the Bacterial Keratitis Study Research Group.氧氟沙星与头孢唑林和妥布霉素治疗细菌性角膜炎的疗效比较。细菌性角膜炎研究小组报告。 (注:原文中“of ofloxacin”多了一个of)
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Oct;113(10):1257-65. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100100045026.
10
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus corneal ulcers.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌角膜溃疡
Ann Ophthalmol. 1991 Nov;23(11):414-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Etiological and Clinical Features of Contact Lens-Associated Microbial Keratitis.接触镜相关微生物角膜炎的病因和临床特征。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 28;52(5):309-317. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.09633.
2
A European perspective on topical ophthalmic antibiotics: current and evolving options.欧洲视角下的局部眼科抗生素:当前及不断发展的选择
Ophthalmol Eye Dis. 2011 Oct 24;3:29-43. doi: 10.4137/OED.S4866. Print 2011.
3
Chronic Postoperative Endophthalmitis Caused by Actinomyces meyeri.迈耶放线菌引起的慢性术后眼内炎
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar 5;2(1):95-8. doi: 10.1159/000326062.