Suppr超能文献

比较局部固定复方强化万古霉素-阿米卡星(VA 溶液)与常规单独治疗细菌性角膜溃疡的疗效。

Comparison of topical fixed-combination fortified vancomycin-amikacin (VA solution) to conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):294-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703078. Epub 2008 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In an in vitro study, fixed-combination fortified vancomycin and amikacin ophthalmic solutions (VA solution) had the same potency and stable physical properties as the separate components. In this retrospective clinical study, we evaluated the efficacy of the topical VA solution in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer and comparison with separate topical fortified vancomycin and amikacin.

METHODS

Separate topical fortified eye drops was used prior to January 2004 and switched to the VA solution afterwards in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer. The medical records of 223 patients diagnosed with bacterial corneal ulcers between January 2002 and December 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 122 patients in the VA group and 101 in the separate group. Cure was defined as complete healing of the ulcer accompanied by a nonprogressive stromal infiltrate on two consecutive visits.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the VA and separate therapy group. The mean treatment duration was 15.4 days in the VA group and 16.1 days in the separate therapy group. The average hospital stay was 5.4 days (VA) and 7.2 days (separate antibiotics). Stromal infiltration regressed significantly without further expansion in both groups. All corneal ulcers completely re-epithelialized without complications related to drugs.

CONCLUSION

VA solution provided similar efficacy to the conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers; however, it is more convenient and tolerable, promotes patient's compliance, avoids the washout effect, and reduces nurse utilization. Hence, VA solution is a good alternative to separate therapy.

摘要

目的

在一项体外研究中,固定剂量联合强化万古霉素和阿米卡星滴眼液(VA 溶液)与单独成分具有相同的效力和稳定的物理性质。在这项回顾性临床研究中,我们评估了局部应用 VA 溶液治疗细菌性角膜溃疡的疗效,并与单独局部应用强化万古霉素和阿米卡星进行了比较。

方法

在 2004 年 1 月之前,单独使用局部强化滴眼液治疗细菌性角膜溃疡,之后改用 VA 溶液。回顾性分析 2002 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月间诊断为细菌性角膜溃疡的 223 例患者的病历。VA 组 122 例,单独组 101 例。治愈定义为溃疡完全愈合,两次连续就诊时基质浸润无进展。

结果

VA 组与单独治疗组之间无显著差异。VA 组的平均治疗时间为 15.4 天,单独治疗组为 16.1 天。VA 组的平均住院时间为 5.4 天,单独抗生素组为 7.2 天。两组基质浸润均明显消退,无进一步扩大。所有角膜溃疡均完全再上皮化,无与药物相关的并发症。

结论

VA 溶液在治疗细菌性角膜溃疡方面与常规单独治疗疗效相似,但更方便、耐受性更好,可提高患者的依从性,避免冲洗作用,减少护士的使用。因此,VA 溶液是单独治疗的良好替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验