Hainsworth John D, Vazquez Elizabeth R, Spigel David R, Raefsky Eric, Bearden James D, Saez Ruben A, Greco F Anthony
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.
Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1288-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23271.
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of fludarabine and rituximab, followed by alemtuzumab, as first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).
In a nonrandomized phase 2 trial, 41 patients who had previously untreated CLL or SLL and required treatment received 4 cycles of the fludarabine and rituximab combination followed 5 weeks later by 4 weeks (12 doses) of intravenous alemtuzumab therapy. The response to treatment was evaluated after completion of treatment with fludarabine and rituximab, and again after the completion of alemtuzumab consolidation.
Initial treatment with the combination of fludarabine and rituximab was well tolerated, and produced a 71% overall response rate (13% complete response). Thirty-four patients began treatment with intravenous alemtuzumab, but this drug was relatively poorly tolerated when given at a short interval after fludarabine and rituximab, and only 20 patients (49% of total) were able to complete the prescribed course. Five patients had an improvement in their response with alemtuzumab; the final complete response rate was 21%. The median progression-free survival for the entire group was 42 months. Toxicity with alemtuzumab included infusion-related toxicity, myelosuppression, and opportunistic infections.
The intravenous schedule of alemtuzumab employed in the trial was relatively poorly tolerated in this community-based trial. The relatively low complete response rates after treatment with the combination of fludarabine and rituximab and after the completion of treatment suggest that these abbreviated courses may compromise efficacy. The generalized use of alemtuzumab as consolidation therapy cannot yet be recommended for community practice. However, optimization of the route of administration, duration of treatment, and interval after completion of induction therapy may improve efficacy, and further investigation is ongoing.
本研究旨在评估氟达拉滨与利妥昔单抗联合用药,随后使用阿仑单抗作为慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)或小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL)患者一线治疗方案的疗效和毒性。
在一项非随机2期试验中,41例既往未接受过治疗且需要治疗的CLL或SLL患者接受了4个周期的氟达拉滨与利妥昔单抗联合治疗,5周后接受4周(12剂)静脉注射阿仑单抗治疗。在完成氟达拉滨和利妥昔单抗治疗后以及阿仑单抗巩固治疗完成后评估治疗反应。
氟达拉滨与利妥昔单抗联合初始治疗耐受性良好,总缓解率为71%(完全缓解率为13%)。34例患者开始静脉注射阿仑单抗治疗,但在氟达拉滨和利妥昔单抗治疗后短时间内给予该药物时耐受性相对较差,只有20例患者(占总数的49%)能够完成规定疗程。5例患者使用阿仑单抗后反应有所改善;最终完全缓解率为21%。整个组的中位无进展生存期为42个月。阿仑单抗的毒性包括输液相关毒性、骨髓抑制和机会性感染。
在这项基于社区的试验中,试验中采用的阿仑单抗静脉给药方案耐受性相对较差。氟达拉滨与利妥昔单抗联合治疗后以及治疗完成后的完全缓解率相对较低,表明这些缩短疗程可能会影响疗效。目前尚不推荐在社区实践中普遍使用阿仑单抗作为巩固治疗。然而,优化给药途径、治疗持续时间和诱导治疗完成后的间隔时间可能会提高疗效,进一步的研究正在进行中。