Suppr超能文献

Tissue microarray based analysis of prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer: much effort to no avail?

作者信息

Liedberg Fredrik, Anderson Harald, Chebil Gunilla, Gudjonsson Sigurdur, Höglund Mattias, Lindgren David, Lundberg Lena-Maria, Lövgren Kristina, Fernö Mårten, Månsson Wiking

机构信息

Department of Urology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2008 Jan-Feb;26(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.08.021. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate altered protein expression with tissue microarray methodology for 15 different markers with potential prognostic significance in invasive bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Invasive tumor was sampled with the tissue-arraying instrument in 133 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy, and at least 3, 0.6-mm tissue cores were obtained. With immunohistochemistry, the expressions of TP53, RB1, CDKN1A (p21), MKI67 (Ki67), PTGS2 (Cox-2), CTNNA1 (alpha-catenin), CTNNB1 (beta-catenin), AKT, PTEN, RHOA, RHOC, STAT1, VEGFC, EGFR, and ERBB2 (HER2) were quantified, and correlations were made with tumor grade, pathologic stage, lymph node status, and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Decreased immunohistochemical expression of CTNNA1 and of PTEN correlated with higher pathologic tumor stages (P = 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively), whereas increased AKT1 and ERBB2 correlated with lower pathologic tumor stages (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Increased RHOA expression was more common in grade 3 than in grade 2 tumors (P = 0.016). There were no other correlations among the 15 factors studied and pathologic stage, lymph node status, or tumor grade. No association was found between bladder cancer death and altered marker status for any of the markers studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there are reasons to have a skeptical attitude toward the value of tissue microarray based immunohistochemistry as a method for evaluating prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer. In this study, 15 antibodies were tested but were found to be of little clinical value. Whether this negative finding is related to the group of patients or factors studied, or the methodology is unclear.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验