• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替考拉宁与万古霉素治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效和毒性审计:不同的毒性特征在临床上是否相关?

An audit of efficacy and toxicity of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in febrile neutropenia: is the different toxicity profile clinically relevant?

作者信息

Hahn-Ast C, Glasmacher A, Arns A, Mühling A, Orlopp K, Marklein G, Von Lilienfeld-Toal M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany,

出版信息

Infection. 2008 Feb;36(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-7126-4. Epub 2008 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1007/s15010-007-7126-4
PMID:18193385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glycopeptides are often used for persistent fever in neutropenic patients. This study compares efficacy and toxicity of teicoplanin and vancomycin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Hundred consecutive neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies and persistent fever after 72 h of first-line antibiotic therapy (91% piperacillin/tazobactam) were treated with teicoplanin (800 mg on day 1, then 400 mg/day)+piperacillin/tazobactam+gentamicin from 08/96 to 09/00 (group T) or with vancomycin (2 g/day)+meropenem+levofloxacin from 10/00 to 04/02 (group V). Success was defervescence (>or=7 days) in absence of any sign of continuing infection. Nephrotoxicity was monitored daily as increase in serum creatinine.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were analyzed in each group. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with piperacillin/tazobactam as first-line therapy only. Treatment was successful in 76% in group T (n=42) and 59% in group V (n=49), p=0.118. Toxicity was evaluated in all patients. The median increase of creatinine was 11% (interquartile range 0%-30%) in group T and 17% (0%-74%) in group V, p=0.062. In patients who received concomitant amphotericin B (given for 7 days and 6 days, respectively, p=0.525), median creatinine increased from 0.9 mg/dl (0.8-1.1) to 1.2 mg/dl (0.9-1.5) in group T and from 0.9 mg/dl (0.8-1.08) to 1.55 mg/dl (1.33-2.23) in group V (p<0.001). This led to a doubling of creatinine in 2/23 (9%) patients of group T and in 9/16 (56%) patients of group V (p=0.003). A multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant use of amphotericin B (p<0.001) and treatment with vancomycin (p=0.002) were independently associated with nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Teicoplanin and vancomycin were comparably effective in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever, but - if combined with amphotericin B - vancomycin was significantly more nephrotoxic than teicoplanin.

摘要

背景

糖肽类药物常用于中性粒细胞减少患者的持续发热。本研究比较替考拉宁和万古霉素的疗效及毒性。

患者与方法

连续100例血液系统恶性肿瘤且在一线抗生素治疗(91%为哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)72小时后仍持续发热的中性粒细胞减少患者,于1996年8月至2000年9月接受替考拉宁(第1天800mg,之后每日400mg)+哌拉西林/他唑巴坦+庆大霉素治疗(T组),或于2000年10月至2002年4月接受万古霉素(每日2g)+美罗培南+左氧氟沙星治疗(V组)。成功标准为退热(≥7天)且无任何持续感染迹象。每日监测肾毒性,以血清肌酐升高情况为准。

结果

每组分析50例患者。仅对以哌拉西林/他唑巴坦作为一线治疗的患者评估疗效。T组76%(n = 42)治疗成功,V组59%(n = 49)治疗成功,p = 0.118。对所有患者评估毒性。T组肌酐升高中位数为11%(四分位间距0% - 30%),V组为17%(0% - 74%),p = 0.062。在接受两性霉素B联合治疗的患者中(分别给药7天和6天,p = 0.525),T组肌酐中位数从0.9mg/dl(0.8 - 1.1)升至1.2mg/dl(0.9 - 1.5),V组从0.9mg/dl(0.8 - 1.08)升至1.55mg/dl(1.33 - 2.23)(p < 0.001)。这导致T组2/23(9%)患者和V组9/16(56%)患者的肌酐翻倍(p = 0.003)。多因素分析显示,联合使用两性霉素B(p < 0.001)和万古霉素治疗(p = 0.002)与肾毒性独立相关。

结论

替考拉宁和万古霉素对中性粒细胞减少和持续发热患者疗效相当,但与两性霉素B联用时,万古霉素的肾毒性显著高于替考拉宁。

相似文献

1
An audit of efficacy and toxicity of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in febrile neutropenia: is the different toxicity profile clinically relevant?替考拉宁与万古霉素治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效和毒性审计:不同的毒性特征在临床上是否相关?
Infection. 2008 Feb;36(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-7126-4. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
2
Randomized prospective study comparing cost-effectiveness of teicoplanin and vancomycin as second-line empiric therapy for infection in neutropenic patients.比较替考拉宁和万古霉素作为中性粒细胞减少患者感染二线经验性治疗的成本效益的随机前瞻性研究。
Haematologica. 1999 Mar;84(3):231-6.
3
[Imipenem combined with teicoplanin or vancomycin in the initial empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. Analysis of the primary response and of a global sequential strategy in 126 episodes].[亚胺培南联合替考拉宁或万古霉素用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症的初始经验性治疗。对126例病例的主要反应及整体序贯策略分析]
Rev Clin Esp. 1996 Aug;196(8):515-22.
4
Tolerability of teicoplanin in 117 hospitalized adults with previous vancomycin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia: a retrospective chart review.117 例既往万古霉素引起发热、皮疹或中性粒细胞减少症的住院成人患者使用替考拉宁的耐受性:回顾性病历审查。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1977-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.010.
5
Teicoplanin-induced hypersensitivity syndrome with a preceding vancomycin-induced neutropenia: a case report and literature review.替考拉宁诱导的超敏反应综合征伴先前万古霉素诱导的中性粒细胞减少症:一例病例报告及文献复习。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Dec;35(6):729-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01124.x.
6
[The use of teicoplanin in neutropenic patients: values and limits].[替考拉宁在中性粒细胞减少患者中的应用:价值与局限]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):552-6.
7
[Value of mono-antibiotic therapy using piperacillin associated with sulbactam and possibly followed by vancomycin in febrile neutropenia in solid tumors].[哌拉西林联合舒巴坦单药治疗并可能序贯万古霉素在实体瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的价值]
Bull Cancer. 1994 Oct;81(10):871-6.
8
[Value of the combination of piperacillin and pefloxacin possibly followed by vancomycin in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in nephrotoxic chemotherapy].
Bull Cancer. 1992;79(7):705-12.
9
Should vancomycin be used empirically in febrile patients with prolonged and profound neutropenia? Results of a randomized trial.
Eur J Med. 1993 May;2(5):275-80.
10
Double-blind comparison of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in febrile neutropenic patients receiving concomitant tobramycin and piperacillin: effect on cyclosporin A-associated nephrotoxicity.在接受妥布霉素和哌拉西林联合治疗的发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中替考拉宁与万古霉素的双盲比较:对环孢素A相关肾毒性的影响
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Nov;35(11):2246-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.11.2246.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Arbekacin against Pneumonia in Febrile Neutropenia: A Retrospective Study in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.阿贝卡星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者肺炎的临床疗效与安全性:一项针对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的回顾性研究
Infect Chemother. 2022 Mar;54(1):80-90. doi: 10.3947/ic.2021.0126.
2
The Use of Vancomycin Versus Teicoplanin in Treating Febrile Neutropenia: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.万古霉素与替考拉宁治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效比较:一项Meta分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2021 May 27;13(5):e15269. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15269.
3
The prevention and management of infections due to multidrug resistant organisms in haematology patients.
血液学患者中多重耐药菌感染的预防与管理
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;79(2):195-207. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12310.
4
Vancomycin utilization evaluation at hematology-oncology ward of a teaching hospital in iran.伊朗一家教学医院血液肿瘤科万古霉素使用情况评估
Iran J Pharm Res. 2012 Winter;11(1):163-70.
5
Tigecycline in febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies: a retrospective case documentation in four university hospitals.替加环素在血液恶性肿瘤合并发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的应用:四家大学附属医院的回顾性病例记录。
Infection. 2014 Feb;42(1):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0524-x. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter.系统评价和荟萃分析万古霉素诱导的肾毒性与维持谷浓度在 15 至 20 毫克/升之间的给药方案相关。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Feb;57(2):734-44. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01568-12. Epub 2012 Nov 19.