Mulatero Paolo, Bertello Chiara, Rossato Denis, Mengozzi Giulio, Milan Alberto, Garrone Corrado, Giraudo Giuseppe, Passarino Giorgio, Garabello Domenica, Verhovez Andrea, Rabbia Franco, Veglio Franco
Department of Medicine and Experimental Oncology, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Apr;93(4):1366-71. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2055. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
In patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), it is fundamental to distinguish between subtypes that benefit from different therapies. Computed tomography (CT) scans lack sensitivity and specificity and must be followed by adrenal venous sampling (AVS). Because AVS is not widely available, a list of clinical criteria that indicate the presence of an aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) has been suggested.
The objective of the study was to test the sensitivity and specificity of the last generation CT scans, test prospectively the usefulness of clinical criteria in the diagnosis of APA, and develop a flow chart to be used when AVS is not easily available.
Hypertensive patients referred to our hypertension unit were included in our study.
Seventy-one patients with confirmed PA participated in our study.
All patients had a CT scan and underwent AVS.
Final diagnosis of APA was the main measure.
A total of 44 and 56% of patients were diagnosed as having an APA and a bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH), respectively. Twenty percent of patients with PA displayed hypokalemia. CT scans displayed a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.71. The posture test displayed a lower sensitivity and specificity (0.64 and 0.70, respectively). The distribution grades of hypertension were not significantly different between APA and BAH. Biochemical criteria of high probability of APA displayed a sensitivity of 0.32 and a specificity of 0.95.
This study underlines the central role of AVS in the subtype diagnosis of PA. The use of the clinical criteria to distinguish between APA and BAH did not display a satisfactory diagnostic power.
在原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)患者中,区分受益于不同治疗方法的亚型至关重要。计算机断层扫描(CT)缺乏敏感性和特异性,必须继之以肾上腺静脉采血(AVS)。由于AVS尚未广泛应用,因此有人提出了一系列提示醛固酮瘤(APA)存在的临床标准。
本研究的目的是测试最新一代CT扫描的敏感性和特异性,前瞻性地测试临床标准在APA诊断中的实用性,并制定在AVS不易获得时使用的流程图。
纳入本研究的是转诊至我们高血压科的高血压患者。
71例确诊为PA的患者参与了本研究。
所有患者均进行了CT扫描并接受了AVS。
APA的最终诊断是主要指标。
分别有44%和56%的患者被诊断为患有APA和双侧肾上腺增生(BAH)。20%的PA患者出现低钾血症。CT扫描的敏感性为0.87,特异性为0.71。体位试验的敏感性和特异性较低(分别为0.64和0.70)。APA和BAH之间高血压的分布等级无显著差异。APA高概率的生化标准敏感性为0.32,特异性为0.95。
本研究强调了AVS在PA亚型诊断中的核心作用。使用临床标准区分APA和BAH并未显示出令人满意的诊断能力。