• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Overall and therapy specific mortality of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in Zagreb University Hospital Centre].

作者信息

Strozzi Maja, Bulum Josko, Ernst Aleksander, Margetić Eduard, Skorak Ivan, Putarek Kresimir, Gornik Ivan

机构信息

Klinika za bolesti srca i krvnih zila, KBC Zagreb

出版信息

Lijec Vjesn. 2007 Aug-Sep;129(8-9):260-4.

PMID:18198624
Abstract

In Coronary Care Unit and Intensive Care Unit, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, 403 patients were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the year 2005. Majority (288) patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 115 patients with acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI). In-hospital mortality of STEMI patients was 13.9% vs. 9.6% of NSTEMI group of patients. In STEMI group 202 patients underwent urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 86 patients in STEMI group received conservative therapy. In-hospital mortality of patients treated with primary PCI was 5.9% vs. 29.1% in the group treated conservatively. The main reason for conservative therapy was late presentation to the hospital (> 12 hours from the beginning of symptoms). Only 11 high-risk patients in NSTEMI group underwent primary PCI and 99 NSTEMI patients received conservative therapy (in-hospital mortality 10.1%). We performed totally 218 urgent PCI interventions in both groups with low in-hospital mortality of 6.1% in comparison with high mortality in conservatively treated groups of patients. The mortality in PCI group was strongly connected with unsuccessful intervention and late reperfusion. Total ischemic time (6 hours and 5 minutes), and time from hospital presentation to reperfusion -"door to balloon time" (1 hour and 25 minutes) are longer that in similar patients series, and need to be improved. Transportation time (1 hour and 40 minutes) is acceptable. In conclusion, high percentage (70.1%) of STEMI and NSTEMI patients underwent primary PCI in our institution with low perioperative mortality. This group of patients had superior in-hospital mortality when compared with conservatively treated group of patients. There is still unacceptably high percentage of patients with AMI, who came into the hospital too late for any reperfusion therapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Overall and therapy specific mortality of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in Zagreb University Hospital Centre].
Lijec Vjesn. 2007 Aug-Sep;129(8-9):260-4.
2
Treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania province of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy.波兰西波美拉尼亚省急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗。直接冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗的比较。
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jun;64(6):591-9; discussion 600-1.
3
Comparison of outcomes and safety of "facilitated" versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中“易化”与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效与安全性比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 1;103(3):316-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.078. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
4
Regional systems of care to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Mayo Clinic STEMI Protocol.优化ST段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注治疗及时性的区域护理系统:梅奥诊所ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗方案
Circulation. 2007 Aug 14;116(7):729-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699934. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
5
Reperfusion therapy for acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: what can be achieved in daily clinical practice in unselected patients at an interventional center?急性ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的再灌注治疗:在一家介入中心的未选择患者的日常临床实践中能取得什么成果?
Acute Card Care. 2009;11(2):92-8. doi: 10.1080/17482940902806106.
6
Comparison of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus those with unstable and stable angina pectoris.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者与不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的长期死亡率比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 1;104(3):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.052. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
7
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时由医生转运与由患者转运的情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91.
8
Comparison of early mortality of paramedic-diagnosed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with immediate transport to a designated primary percutaneous coronary intervention center to that of similar patients transported to the nearest hospital.医护人员诊断的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者立即转运至指定的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心与转运至最近医院的类似患者早期死亡率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 15;98(10):1329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.019. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
9
Management and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation vs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Data from the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes.非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理与死亡率。来自小波兰急性冠脉综合征登记处的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):115-20; discussion 121-2.
10
ST-elevation myocardial infarction mortality in a major academic center "on-" versus "off-" hours.某主要学术中心非工作时间与工作时间的ST段抬高型心肌梗死死亡率
J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Oct;21(10):518-23.