Suppr超能文献

两种用于确定HIV-1嗜性的基因分型算法的比较。

Comparison of two genotypic algorithms to determine HIV-1 tropism.

作者信息

Soulié C, Derache A, Aimé C, Marcelin A-G, Carcelain G, Simon A, Katlama C, Calvez V

机构信息

Department of Virology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 University, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France.

出版信息

HIV Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00518.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

One or both of two co-receptors, CCR5 (R5) and CXCR4 (X4), are used by HIV-1 to enter into host cells. The glycoprotein 120 (gp120) V3 sequence is correlated with the R5 and X4 phenotype. CCR5 inhibitors are specifically active against R5 viruses, suggesting the need to determine tropism before the use of these antagonists. A comparison of the position-specific scoring matrices (PSSM) and Geno2pheno algorithms based on the V3 loop gp120 sequences and previously described to be correlated to the R5 or X4 phenotype was carried out.

METHODS

V3 envelope (env) genes from 83 plasma samples were amplified and sequenced, and 69 sequences were analysed with the PSSM and Geno2pheno algorithms.

RESULTS

These two algorithms were concordant in 86.5% of cases. The Geno2pheno algorithm gave a tropism result more frequently than the PSSM algorithm, but R5X4 or X4 viruses were less frequently detected by the Geno2pheno algorithm. R5X4 or X4 tropism was predicted in 29.9% of samples. There was more R5X4 co-receptor use in the antiretroviral-treated group than in the antiretroviral-naïve group.

CONCLUSIONS

It is advisable to run a validated co-receptor use prediction tool before using co-receptor antagonists. If genotyping methods are considered, the PSSM and Geno2pheno algorithms are complementary and both are necessary. The association between predicted co-receptor use and virological response to co-receptor antagonists needs to be thoroughly evaluated.

摘要

目的

人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)利用两种共受体CCR5(R5)和CXCR4(X4)中的一种或两种进入宿主细胞。糖蛋白120(gp120)V3序列与R5和X4表型相关。CCR5抑制剂对R5病毒具有特异性活性,这表明在使用这些拮抗剂之前需要确定病毒嗜性。基于V3环gp120序列并先前描述为与R5或X4表型相关的位置特异性评分矩阵(PSSM)和Geno2pheno算法进行了比较。

方法

对83份血浆样本中的V3包膜(env)基因进行扩增和测序,并用PSSM和Geno2pheno算法分析了69个序列。

结果

这两种算法在86.5%的病例中结果一致。Geno2pheno算法比PSSM算法更频繁地得出病毒嗜性结果,但Geno2pheno算法检测到R5X4或X4病毒的频率较低。在29.9%的样本中预测到R5X4或X4嗜性。抗逆转录病毒治疗组比未接受抗逆转录病毒治疗组更多地使用R5X4共受体。

结论

在使用共受体拮抗剂之前,建议运行经过验证的共受体使用预测工具。如果考虑基因分型方法,PSSM和Geno2pheno算法是互补的,两者都是必要的。预测的共受体使用与共受体拮抗剂的病毒学反应之间的关联需要进行全面评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验