• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NICE and judicial review: enforcing 'accountability for reasonableness' through the courts?

作者信息

Syrett Keith

机构信息

School of Law University of Bristol.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2008 Spring;16(1):127-40. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwm025. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwm025
PMID:18199568
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
NICE and judicial review: enforcing 'accountability for reasonableness' through the courts?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）与司法审查：通过法院强制实行“合理性问责制”？
Med Law Rev. 2008 Spring;16(1):127-40. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwm025. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
2
Health technology appraisal and the courts: accountability for reasonableness and the judicial model of procedural justice.卫生技术评估与法院：合理性的问责制与程序正义的司法模式。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Oct;6(4):469-88. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000228. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
3
What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'?坦桑尼亚的地区卫生规划者对于采用“合理性问责制”来改进优先事项设定有何看法？
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 12;7:180. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-180.
4
Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?公平性与合理的问责制。不同卫生系统以及决策层级中，确定优先事项的决策者的观点是否存在差异？
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(4):766-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.011. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
5
If You're a Rawlsian, How Come You're So Close to Utilitarianism and Intuitionism? A Critique of Daniels's Accountability for Reasonableness.如果你是罗尔斯主义者，为何你如此接近功利主义和直觉主义？对丹尼尔斯“合理的可问责性”观点的批判
Health Care Anal. 2018 Mar;26(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9.
6
Voters position health service at top of the election agenda.选民将医疗服务置于选举议程的首位。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2015 Apr;22(1):8-9. doi: 10.7748/nm.22.1.8.s9.
7
Reflecting on 'Health technology appraisal and the courts: accountability for reasonableness and the judicial model of procedural justice'.反思《卫生技术评估与法院：合理性问责与程序正义的司法模式》
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Oct;10(4):449-54. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000201. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
8
Principles versus procedures in making health care coverage decisions: addressing inevitable conflicts.医疗保健覆盖范围决策中的原则与程序：应对不可避免的冲突
Theor Med Bioeth. 2008;29(2):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s11017-008-9062-4. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
9
Peer publishes bill to reinstate legal duty of health secretary to provide NHS.皮尔提交法案，以恢复卫生大臣提供国民保健服务的法律职责。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 29;346:f605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f605.
10
Decisions about access to health care and accountability for reasonableness.关于获得医疗保健服务的决策以及合理性问责。
J Urban Health. 1999 Jun;76(2):176-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02344674.

引用本文的文献

1
An empirical ethics study of the coherence of NICE technology appraisal policy and its implications for moral justification.一项关于 NICE 技术评估政策一致性及其对道德论证影响的经验伦理研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 6;25(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01016-0.
2
Health care as a universal right.医疗保健作为一项普遍权利。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2017;25(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10389-016-0762-3. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach.医疗保健中的优先事项设定：一种互补方法。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):292-303. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0243-6.
4
Preventive medicine in the older patient: a United kingdom perspective.老年患者的预防医学：英国视角
Int J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;3(6):379-85.
5
Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?社会价值观在医疗资源配置中的作用：是否全在于健康收益？
Patient. 2011;4(4):207-25. doi: 10.2165/11588880-000000000-00000.
6
Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.全球卫生技术资金决策过程：大同小异。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jun;29(6):475-95. doi: 10.2165/11586420-000000000-00000.