Siiskonen Satu J, Breekveldt-Postma Nancy S, Vincze Gábor, Khan Zeba M, Erkens Joëlle A, Herings Ron M C
PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht,The Netherlands.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(6):1039-44.
To compare persistence with valsartan and enalapril in daily practice.
The PHARMO Record Linkage System includes various data registries including drug dispensing and hospitalizations for > or =2 million subjects in the Netherlands. Patients newly treated with valsartan or enalapril in the period of 1999-2002 were selected. Persistence was calculated by summing up the number of days of continuous treatment. Patients who remained on therapy with valsartan or enalapril for 12 or 24 months were defined as persistent at 1 or 2 years, respectively.
3364 patients received valsartan and 9103 patients received enalapril. About 62% of patients treated with valsartan and 55% of patients treated with enalapril remained on therapy at 12 months after the initial dispensing, while 48% of patients treated with valsartan and 43% of patients treated with enalapril were persistent at 24 months. Patients treated with valsartan were about 20% more likely to stay on treatment than patients treated with enalapril (1 year RR(adj): 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16-1.32; 2 years RR(adj): 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.23).
Real-life persistence is higher with valsartan than with enalapril. The results of this and other studies on persistence in daily practice should be taken into account when deciding upon drug treatment for hypertension.
在日常实践中比较缬沙坦和依那普利的治疗依从性。
PHARMO记录链接系统包含各种数据登记处,涵盖荷兰200多万名受试者的药物配给和住院情况。选取1999年至2002年期间开始用缬沙坦或依那普利进行治疗的患者。通过累加连续治疗天数来计算治疗依从性。分别将持续使用缬沙坦或依那普利治疗12个月或24个月的患者定义为1年或2年治疗依从性良好。
3364例患者接受缬沙坦治疗,9103例患者接受依那普利治疗。初始配药后12个月时,约62%接受缬沙坦治疗的患者和55%接受依那普利治疗的患者仍在继续治疗,而在24个月时,接受缬沙坦治疗的患者中有48%、接受依那普利治疗的患者中有43%治疗依从性良好。接受缬沙坦治疗的患者持续治疗的可能性比接受依那普利治疗的患者高约20%(1年校正风险比:1.23,95%置信区间:1.16 - 1.32;2年校正风险比:1.16,95%置信区间:1.11 - 1.23)。
在实际生活中,缬沙坦的治疗依从性高于依那普利。在决定高血压药物治疗方案时,应考虑本研究及其他关于日常实践中治疗依从性的研究结果。