van den Berg T, Houdart P
Head of Avian Virology and Immunology Unit, Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Groeselenberg 99, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55(1):54-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01103.x.
Eradication of H5 and H7 influenza in a positive flock will include mass depopulation of birds, containment and inactivation of the virus in the carcasses and litter, and decontamination of the facility. A quick response is desired in the event of a disease outbreak. Ideally, birds should be depopulated within 24 h after detecting the virus. Mass depopulation of birds must be performed in a humane manner while minimizing human health and biosecurity risks. In the framework of the European legislation, a number of methods are authorized for the killing of poultry for processing prior to marketing. However, during emergencies such as a disease outbreak, there are fewer options. The current most commonly used procedures for large-scale emergency depopulation of birds consist of exposing poultry to CO or CO(2) gas. Both gasses have been used in Belgium during the H7N7 crisis in 2003. The gassing procedures include whole house gassing, portable panel enclosures, cage cabinets, containers and polyethylene tent method. Whole house gassing requires sealing the house to prevent gas leakage and, using specialized equipment, introducing large volumes of gas evenly over the birds. All procedures are very labour intensive, create a biosecurity risk and require a large number of personnel. There are considerable region-to-region differences in emergency depopulation techniques and disposal of carcasses and infected material. Because of the differences in bird type and species, management, housing and stocking density, it is difficult to propose a depopulation technique that will be suitable for all circumstances. Safety of the human operators is an increasing concern with all H5 and H7 strains and in particular with the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain. Researchers and commercial poultry companies in the United States recently established that non-toxic water-based foam with a certain bubble size presents a practicable, effective and humane method for mass depopulation. Foam of the right bubble size creates an occlusion in the trachea of birds, causing a rapid onset of hypoxia. The foam that blankets the broiler house induces physical hypoxia - the same cause of death as the approved method using carbon dioxide gas (CO(2)). The article illustrates the different culling and disposal methods with a focus on the methods used during the 2003 H7N7 crisis in Belgium.
在一个阳性禽群中根除H5和H7流感病毒,将包括大规模扑杀禽类、对尸体和垫料中的病毒进行控制和灭活,以及对设施进行消毒。在疾病爆发时需要迅速做出反应。理想情况下,在检测到病毒后的24小时内应对禽类进行扑杀。必须以人道的方式进行大规模扑杀禽类,同时将对人类健康和生物安全的风险降至最低。在欧洲立法框架内,有多种方法被批准用于在上市前宰杀家禽以供加工。然而,在诸如疾病爆发等紧急情况下,选择较少。目前,大规模紧急扑杀禽类最常用的程序是让家禽接触一氧化碳或二氧化碳气体。在2003年比利时H7N7危机期间,这两种气体都曾被使用。气体处理程序包括整栋房屋气体处理、便携式面板围栏、笼柜、容器和聚乙烯帐篷法。整栋房屋气体处理需要密封房屋以防止气体泄漏,并使用专门设备将大量气体均匀地引入禽类上方。所有程序都非常耗费人力,会带来生物安全风险,并且需要大量人员。紧急扑杀技术以及尸体和感染材料的处理在不同地区存在相当大的差异。由于禽类类型和品种、管理、饲养方式和饲养密度的不同,很难提出一种适用于所有情况的扑杀技术。对于所有H5和H7毒株,尤其是高致病性H5N1毒株,人类操作人员的安全日益受到关注。美国的研究人员和商业家禽公司最近确定,具有一定气泡大小的无毒水基泡沫是一种可行、有效且人道的大规模扑杀方法。合适气泡大小的泡沫会在禽类气管中形成堵塞,导致迅速出现缺氧。覆盖肉鸡舍的泡沫会引发生理性缺氧——这与使用二氧化碳气体(CO₂)的批准方法导致的死亡原因相同。本文重点介绍了2003年比利时H7N7危机期间所使用的方法,阐述了不同的扑杀和处理方法。