Suppr超能文献

氨磺必利对氯氮平部分反应或无反应的精神分裂症患者的增效作用。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Amisulpride augmentation in patients with schizophrenia partially responsive or unresponsive to clozapine. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Assion H-J, Reinbold H, Lemanski S, Basilowski M, Juckel G

机构信息

LWL-Klinik Bochum, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic and Preventive Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 2008 Jan;41(1):24-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993209.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Only limited data are available on the effectiveness of augmented antipsychotics to clozapine therapy in chronic schizophrenia. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of augmentation with the atypical neuroleptic amisulpride to clozapine in a small sample group of patients.

METHODS

16 patients with the DSM-IV diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia and partially responsive to clozapine participated in this pilot study. Patients on a steady dose of clozapine randomly received either clozapine and amisulpride 400 mg/day (n=7) or clozapine and amisulpride 600 mg/day (n=6) or clozapine and placebo for 6 weeks (n=3). Efficacy measures were BPRS, CGI, GAF and MADRS score. Side effects and prolactin levels were obtained. Primary outcome measure were BPRS score changes.

RESULTS

The beneficial effect of augmented amisulpride at a daily dose of 600 mg was observed in the mean scores of secondary outcome measures, as assessed by GAF, CGI and MADRS. Measures of primary objectives failed to improve significantly. No reduction in BPRS total score was achieved due to lack of power of the study, whereas the BPRS subscore "activity" had a tendency to improve. Amisulpride was more beneficial in a higher than a lower dose. No severe side-effects occurred, but tremor, bradykinesia, akathisia and elevated prolactin levels were recorded.

DISCUSSION

Augmented amisulpride improved the global outcome of patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia in this pilot study and tended to be a helpful treatment option in cases of partial or non-responsiveness to clozapine. Limitations emerge from the small sample size and lack of power. Further investigation requires a larger number of patients to be included.

摘要

引言

关于增强型抗精神病药物对慢性精神分裂症患者氯氮平治疗效果的数据有限。我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的试点研究,以评估在一小群患者中,非典型抗精神病药物氨磺必利增强氯氮平治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

16例符合DSM-IV诊断标准的慢性精神分裂症患者且对氯氮平部分有效的患者参与了这项试点研究。服用稳定剂量氯氮平的患者被随机分为三组,分别接受氯氮平联合400毫克/天氨磺必利治疗(n = 7)、氯氮平联合600毫克/天氨磺必利治疗(n = 6)或氯氮平联合安慰剂治疗6周(n = 3)。疗效指标包括简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、临床总体印象量表(CGI)、大体功能评定量表(GAF)和抑郁自评量表(MADRS)评分。记录副作用和催乳素水平。主要结局指标是BPRS评分变化。

结果

通过GAF、CGI和MADRS评估,每日剂量600毫克的氨磺必利增强治疗在次要结局指标的平均得分上显示出有益效果。主要目标指标未显著改善。由于研究效能不足,BPRS总分未降低,而BPRS子项“活动”有改善趋势。高剂量氨磺必利比低剂量更有益。未出现严重副作用,但记录到震颤、运动迟缓、静坐不能和催乳素水平升高。

讨论

在这项试点研究中,氨磺必利增强治疗改善了慢性精神分裂症患者的整体结局,对于对氯氮平部分或无反应的病例,可能是一种有用的治疗选择。局限性在于样本量小和效能不足。进一步研究需要纳入更多患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验