• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The American biodefense industry: from emergency to nonemergence.

作者信息

Lentzos Filippa

机构信息

London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

Politics Life Sci. 2007 Mar;26(1):15-23. doi: 10.2990/26_1_15.

DOI:10.2990/26_1_15
PMID:18208342
Abstract

Since 1998, and especially since the "Amerithrax" emergency of 2001, the United States has ambitiously funded biodefense projects, intending not only to enhance detection and management of any biological-weapons attack but also to establish a robust domestic biodefense industry. I asked if the United States had fulfilled this latter intention. Using the RAND Corporation's RaDiUS database, I examined federal biodefense grants and contracts awarded from 1995 through most of 2005, noting recipient type, awarding unit, funding level, and the disease focus of research-and-development support. Patterns in these data as well as other sources suggest that the biodefense industry as late as 2005 remained in a nascent stage, with most firms small, precariously financed, and more responsive to funders' announcements and solicitations than to opportunities for self-directed innovation. A biodefense industry with investor-capital funding and retained earnings, with its own leading companies, with its own stock analysts, and with its own legitimacy in commercial and financial markets did not emerge over the period studied, nor does its emergence appear imminent.

摘要

相似文献

1
The American biodefense industry: from emergency to nonemergence.
Politics Life Sci. 2007 Mar;26(1):15-23. doi: 10.2990/26_1_15.
2
Billions for biodefense: federal agency biodefense funding, FY2009-FY2010.数十亿美元用于生物防御:2009财年至2010财年联邦机构的生物防御资金
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Sep;7(3):291-309. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0035.
3
A shocking biodefense editorial.一篇令人震惊的生物防御社论。
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Oct;25(10):1083; author reply 1083-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt1007-1083a.
4
US biodefense--shocking and awful.美国的生物防御——令人震惊且糟糕透顶。
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jun;25(6):603. doi: 10.1038/nbt0607-603.
5
Billions for biodefense: federal agency biodefense budgeting, FY2005-FY2006.数十亿美元用于生物防御:2005财年至2006财年联邦机构的生物防御预算
Biosecur Bioterror. 2005;3(2):94-101. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.94.
6
Federal agency biodefense funding, FY2012-FY2013.2012财年至2013财年联邦机构生物防御资金
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Jun;10(2):162-81. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0025.
7
E3LSI research: an essential element of biodefense.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2005;3(2):128-37. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.128.
8
Cost/success projections for US biodefense countermeasure development.美国生物防御对策研发的成本/成功预测。
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Sep;26(9):981-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt0908-981.
9
Seeking innovation: incentive funding for biodefense biotechs.寻求创新:生物防御生物技术公司的激励资金。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2010 Dec;8(4):365-72. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0044.
10
Incentives for biodefense countermeasure development.生物防御对策研发的激励措施。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2007 Sep;5(3):228-38. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2007.0030.

引用本文的文献

1
The social, political, ethical, and economic aspects of biodefense vaccines.生物防御疫苗的社会、政治、伦理和经济方面。
Vaccine. 2009 Nov 5;27 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):D23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.054.