Sanguineti Giuseppe, Endres Eugene J, Parker Brent C, Bicquart Celine, Little Michael, Chen George, Berilgen Jason
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(2):301-10. doi: 10.1080/02841860701558849.
To assess the acute toxicity profile of whole pelvis IMRT (WP-IMRT) for localized prostate cancer.
Eighty seven patients treated with definitive WP-IMRT at UTMB from May 2002 to November 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment consisted of two sequential phases, WP-IMRT to 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction to the pelvic nodes and seminal vesicles and 60 Gy at 2 Gy to the prostate, and a separate external beam boost, 3DCRT or IMRT, to bring the dose to the prostate to 76 Gy. Acute toxicity was prospectively scored weekly during treatment and at 3 month follow-up according to CTC v2.0 for 10 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) domains. The proportion of patients experiencing a given level of peak acute toxicity at a given point is reported.
Treatment was feasible with delivered doses to PTVs not significantly lower than planned ones and with only two patients experiencing treatment gaps longer than 5 days. About 2/3 and 1/10 of the patients experienced peak grade 2 and grade 3 reactions at least once during RT, respectively. Frequency/urgency (Grade 2+: 37.9%) and diarrhea (36.7%) were the most prevalent symptoms followed by proctitis (21.8%) and dysuria (16.1%). GI reactions were generally shorter lasting compared to GU ones which accumulated progressively during treatment. At 3 months, almost half of the patients were asymptomatic and most of observed reactions (89.2%) were mild, with GI ones more likely to be fully resolved (92.5%) than GU ones (68.7%, chi(2), p=0.001).
Our approach is dosimetrically and clinically feasible with intense, but transient, acute toxicity.
评估全盆腔调强放射治疗(WP-IMRT)用于局限性前列腺癌的急性毒性特征。
回顾性分析了2002年5月至2006年11月在德克萨斯大学医学分部(UTMB)接受根治性WP-IMRT治疗的87例患者。治疗包括两个连续阶段,对盆腔淋巴结和精囊进行WP-IMRT,每次分割剂量1.8 Gy,总量54 Gy,对前列腺进行每次分割剂量2 Gy,总量60 Gy,以及单独的外照射剂量增加,采用三维适形放疗(3DCRT)或调强放射治疗(IMRT),使前列腺剂量达到76 Gy。在治疗期间每周及治疗后3个月随访时,根据美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准(CTC)v2.0对10个泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)领域进行急性毒性前瞻性评分。报告了在给定时间点出现给定水平急性毒性峰值的患者比例。
治疗可行,计划靶体积(PTV)的实际 delivered 剂量不显著低于计划剂量,仅有2例患者出现超过5天的治疗中断。分别约2/3和1/10的患者在放疗期间至少经历过一次2级和3级反应峰值。尿频/尿急(2级及以上:37.9%)和腹泻(36.7%)是最常见的症状,其次是直肠炎(21.8%)和排尿困难(16.1%)。与泌尿生殖系统反应相比,胃肠道反应持续时间通常较短,泌尿生殖系统反应在治疗期间逐渐累积。在3个月时,几乎一半的患者无症状,观察到的大多数反应(89.2%)为轻度,胃肠道反应比泌尿生殖系统反应更可能完全缓解(92.5%比68.7%,卡方检验,p = 0.001)。
我们的方法在剂量学和临床上是可行的,具有强烈但短暂的急性毒性。