Bonney S, Stickley T
School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Duncan MacMillan House, Nottingham, UK.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Mar;15(2):140-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01185.x.
Recovery is not a new concept within mental health, although in recent times, it has come to the forefront of the policy agenda. However, there is no universal definition of recovery, and it is a contested concept. The aim of this study was to examine the British literature relating to recovery in mental health. Three contributing groups are identified: service users, health care providers and policy makers. A review of the literature was conducted by accessing all relevant published texts. A search was conducted using these terms: 'recovery', 'schizophrenia', 'psychosis', 'mental illness' and 'mental health'. Over 170 papers were reviewed. A thematic analysis was conducted. Six main themes emerged, which were examined from the perspective of the stakeholder groups. The dominant themes were identity, the service provision agenda, the social domain, power and control, hope and optimism, risk and responsibility. Consensus was found around the belief that good quality care should be made available to service users to promote recovery both as inpatient or in the community. However, the manner in which recovery was defined and delivered differed between the groups.
康复并非心理健康领域的新概念，尽管在最近，它已成为政策议程的首要议题。然而，对于康复并没有统一的定义，它是一个存在争议的概念。本研究的目的是审视英国有关心理健康康复的文献。确定了三个贡献群体：服务使用者、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者。通过查阅所有相关的已发表文本对文献进行了综述。使用以下术语进行了搜索：“康复”、“精神分裂症”、“精神病”、“精神疾病”和“心理健康”。审查了170多篇论文。进行了主题分析。出现了六个主要主题，并从利益相关者群体的角度对其进行了审视。主要主题包括身份认同、服务提供议程、社会领域、权力与控制、希望与乐观主义、风险与责任。大家一致认为，应该为服务使用者提供高质量的护理，以促进其在住院期间或社区中的康复。然而，不同群体对康复的定义和实施方式存在差异。
