• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Dose-escalated CHOEP for the treatment of young patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: I. A randomized dose escalation and feasibility study with bi- and tri-weekly regimens.

作者信息

Trümper L, Zwick C, Ziepert M, Hohloch K, Schmits R, Mohren M, Liersch R, Bentz M, Graeven U, Wruck U, Hoffmann M, Metzner B, Hasenclever D, Loeffler M, Pfreundschuh M

机构信息

Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2008 Mar;19(3):538-44. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm497. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdm497
PMID:18212092
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the maximum tolerated dose of a bi- and tri-weekly combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus etoposide (CHOEP) regimen without stem-cell support.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Randomized phase I/II multicenter four-level (cyclophosphamide: 1000-1200-1400-1600 mg/m2; doxorubicin: 55-60-65-70 mg/m2; etoposide: 375-450-525-600 mg/m2) dose escalation study with CHOEP-14 and CHOEP-21 in young patients (18-60 years) with newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as thrombocytopenia <80,000/mm3 and leukocytopenia <2500/mm3 on days 16 (CHOEP-14) and 23 (CHOEP-21) or prolonged (>4 days) leukocytopenia (<1000/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (<20,000/mm3).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-nine patients (high-CHOEP-14: 47, high-CHOEP-21: 92) were randomly allocated to the study. Maximal tolerated dose was level 2 for CHOEP-14 and level 4 for CHOEP-21. With a less favorable profile of patients in CHOEP-14, 4-year event-free survival was 47.9% after high-CHOEP-14 and 66.2% after high-CHOEP-21, 4-year overall survival 62.1% after high-CHOEP-14 and 73.4% after high-CHOEP-21, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Significant dose escalations of CHOEP are possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, with different chemotherapy models favoring the maximally escalated bi- or tri-weekly regimen, respectively. Because a higher total dose can be achieved with six cycles of the tri-weekly compared with the biweekly regimen, CHOEP-21 at dose escalation level 3 was chosen for a nationwide randomized comparison with baseline CHOEP-21 in a subsequent phase III trial.

摘要

相似文献

1
Dose-escalated CHOEP for the treatment of young patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: I. A randomized dose escalation and feasibility study with bi- and tri-weekly regimens.
Ann Oncol. 2008 Mar;19(3):538-44. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm497. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
2
Practicability and acute haematological toxicity of 2- and 3-weekly CHOP and CHOEP chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).每2周和3周进行一次CHOP及CHOEP化疗用于侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的实用性和急性血液学毒性:德国高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(DSHNHL)的NHL-B试验结果
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):881-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg249.
3
Dose-escalated CHOEP for the treatment of young patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: II. Results of the randomized high-CHOEP trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).剂量递增的CHOEP方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤年轻患者:II. 德国高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(DSHNHL)随机高剂量CHOEP试验结果
Ann Oncol. 2008 Mar;19(3):545-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm514. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
4
Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505.侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受每两周一次CHOP方案及剂量递增CHOP方案联合预防性使用来格司亭(糖基化粒细胞集落刺激因子)的随机II期研究:日本临床肿瘤学组研究9505
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf287.
5
Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone (CHOEP) is not effective in patients with enteropathy-type intestinal T-cell lymphoma.使用环磷酰胺、多柔比星、依托泊苷、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOEP)进行化疗对肠病型肠道T细胞淋巴瘤患者无效。
Ann Oncol. 2004 Nov;15(11):1680-3. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh427.
6
Dose escalation of biweekly cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone using recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.在非霍奇金淋巴瘤中使用重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子进行每两周一次的环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松龙的剂量递增研究。
Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7):1939-44. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1939::aid-cncr2820740719>3.0.co;2-c.
7
Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL.每两周或每三周进行一次CHOP化疗,联合或不联合依托泊苷,用于治疗预后良好(乳酸脱氢酶正常)的年轻侵袭性淋巴瘤患者:荷兰儿童血液肿瘤学组NHL-B1试验的结果
Blood. 2004 Aug 1;104(3):626-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2094. Epub 2004 Feb 24.
8
Dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide (CHOPE) chemotherapy for patients with diffuse lymphoma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies 8852 and 8854.剂量递增的环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松和依托泊苷(CHOPE)化疗方案用于弥漫性淋巴瘤患者:癌症与白血病B组研究8852和8854
Cancer. 2001 Jul 15;92(2):207-17. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<207::aid-cncr1311>3.0.co;2-d.
9
High-dose CHOP as initial therapy for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a dose-finding pilot study.大剂量CHOP方案作为预后不良的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的初始治疗:一项剂量探索性试验研究
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Dec;13(12):2916-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.12.2916.
10
Randomised comparison of CHOEP versus alternating hCHOP/IVEP for high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: treatment results and prognostic factor analysis in a multi-centre trial.CHOP方案与交替使用hCHOP/IVEP方案治疗高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的随机对照研究:一项多中心试验的治疗结果及预后因素分析
Ann Oncol. 1994 Jan;5(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058690.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma in a Patient Previously Diagnosed With Sarcoidosis.一名先前被诊断为结节病的患者发生外周T细胞淋巴瘤。
J Hematol. 2023 Dec;12(6):272-276. doi: 10.14740/jh1173. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
2
Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer.更多是否更好?癌症剂量发现临床试验的毒性和反应结果分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):777. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08440-0.
3
Chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for successful treatment of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: a case report.
化疗联合放疗成功治疗血管免疫母细胞性T细胞淋巴瘤:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2020 Oct 13;14(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02489-4.
4
Model-based optimization of G-CSF treatment during cytotoxic chemotherapy.细胞毒性化疗期间基于模型的粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗优化
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;144(2):343-358. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2540-1. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
5
T-cell lymphomas, a challenging disease: types, treatments, and future.T细胞淋巴瘤:一种具有挑战性的疾病——类型、治疗及未来
Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;22(1):18-51. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-1045-2. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Modelling chemotherapy effects on granulopoiesis.模拟化疗对粒细胞生成的影响。
BMC Syst Biol. 2014 Dec 24;8:138. doi: 10.1186/s12918-014-0138-7.
7
Excellent outcome of young adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with CHOP-like regimens.采用类CHOP方案治疗的年轻侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者疗效优异。
Leukemia. 2014 Nov;28(11):2260-3. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.213. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
A combined model of human erythropoiesis and granulopoiesis under growth factor and chemotherapy treatment.生长因子和化疗治疗下人类红细胞生成与粒细胞生成的联合模型
Theor Biol Med Model. 2014 May 26;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-11-24.
9
Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的预防用粒细胞集落刺激因子:我们现在在哪里?
Support Care Cancer. 2010 May;18(5):529-41. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0816-y. Epub 2010 Feb 27.