Suppr超能文献

上坡骑行表现的异速生长缩放

Allometric scaling of uphill cycling performance.

作者信息

Jobson S A, Woodside J, Passfield L, Nevill A M

机构信息

Department of Sports Studies, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2008 Sep;29(9):753-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-989441. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

Abstract

Previous laboratory-based investigations have identified optimal body mass scaling exponents in the range 0.79-0.91 for uphill cycling. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether or not these exponents are also valid in a field setting. A proportional allometric model was used to predict the optimal power-to-mass ratios associated with road-based uphill time-trial cycling performance. The optimal power function models predicting mean cycle speed during a 5.3 km, 5.4% road hill-climb time-trial were (VO(2max) x m(-1.24))(0.55) and (RMP(max) x m(-1.04))(0.54), explained variance being 84.6% and 70.5%, respectively. Slightly higher mass exponents were observed when the mass predictor was replaced with the combined mass of cyclist and equipment (m(C)). Uphill cycling speed was proportional to (VO(2max) x m(C)(-1.33))(0.57) and (RMP(max) x m(C)(-1.10))(0.59). The curvilinear exponents, 0.54-0.59, identified a relatively strong curvilinear relationship between cycling speed and energy cost, suggesting that air resistance remains influential when cycling up a gradient of 5.4%. These results provide some support for previously reported uphill cycling mass exponents derived in laboratories. However, the exponents reported here were a little higher than those reported previously, a finding possibly explained by a lack of geometric similarity in this sample.

摘要

先前基于实验室的研究已经确定,上坡骑行时最佳体重缩放指数在0.79至0.91之间。本研究的目的是评估这些指数在实际环境中是否也有效。使用比例异速生长模型来预测与公路上坡计时赛骑行表现相关的最佳功率质量比。预测5.3公里、坡度5.4%的公路爬坡计时赛平均骑行速度的最佳功率函数模型分别为(VO(2max)×m(-1.24))(0.55)和(RMP(max)×m(-1.04))(0.54),解释方差分别为84.6%和70.5%。当用自行车手和装备的总质量(m(C))代替质量预测指标时,观察到略高的质量指数。上坡骑行速度与(VO(2max)×m(C)(-1.33))(0.57)和(RMP(max)×m(C)(-1.10))(0.59)成正比。曲线指数0.54 - 0.59表明骑行速度与能量消耗之间存在相对较强的曲线关系,这表明在5.4%的坡度上骑行时空气阻力仍然有影响。这些结果为先前在实验室得出的上坡骑行质量指数提供了一些支持。然而,这里报告的指数比先前报告的略高,这一发现可能是由于该样本中缺乏几何相似性所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验