Suppr超能文献

磁共振标记条纹变形的跟踪和有限元分析。

Tracking and finite element analysis of stripe deformation in magnetic resonance tagging.

机构信息

Dept. of Physiol., Auckland Univ.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995;14(3):413-21. doi: 10.1109/42.414605.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance tissue tagging allows noninvasive in vivo measurement of soft tissue deformation. Planes of magnetic saturation are created, orthogonal to the imaging plane, which form dark lines (stripes) in the image. The authors describe a method for tracking stripe motion in the image plane, and show how this information can be incorporated into a finite element model of the underlying deformation. Human heart data were acquired from several imaging planes in different orientations and were combined using a deformable model of the left ventricle wall. Each tracked stripe point provided information on displacement orthogonal to the original tagging plane, i.e., a one-dimensional (1-D) constraint on the motion. Three-dimensional (3-D) motion and deformation was then reconstructed by fitting the model to the data constraints by linear least squares. The average root mean squared (rms) error between tracked stripe points and predicted model locations was 0.47 mm (n=3,100 points). In order to validate this method and quantify the errors involved, the authors applied it to images of a silicone gel phantom subjected to a known, well-controlled, 3-D deformation. The finite element strains obtained were compared to an analytic model of the deformation known to be accurate in the central axial plane of the phantom. The average rms errors were 6% in both the reconstructed shear strains and 16% in the reconstructed radial normal strain.

摘要

磁共振组织标记允许对软组织变形进行非侵入性的体内测量。与成像平面正交的磁饱和平面会在图像中形成暗线(条纹)。作者描述了一种在图像平面上跟踪条纹运动的方法,并展示了如何将此信息纳入潜在变形的有限元模型中。从不同方向的几个成像平面获取了人类心脏数据,并使用左心室壁的可变形模型进行了组合。每个跟踪的条纹点都提供了与原始标记平面正交的位移信息,即运动的一维(1-D)约束。然后,通过线性最小二乘法将模型拟合到数据约束,从而重建三维(3-D)运动和变形。跟踪条纹点和预测模型位置之间的平均均方根(rms)误差为 0.47 毫米(n=3,100 点)。为了验证这种方法并量化所涉及的误差,作者将其应用于经过已知的、良好控制的 3-D 变形的硅凝胶体模图像。获得的有限元应变与已知在体模的中心轴向平面中准确的变形分析模型进行了比较。在重建的剪切应变和重建的径向法向应变中,平均 rms 误差分别为 6%和 16%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验