Norring M, Manninen E, de Passillé A M, Rushen J, Munksgaard L, Saloniemi H
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Feb;91(2):570-6. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0452.
This experiment compared the effects of sand and straw bedding in free stalls on resting time, cleanliness, hock injuries, and hoof health of dairy cows and tested whether cow preferences for a bedding material depended on the familiarity with the material. A total of 52 dairy cows were kept either on straw bedded concrete stalls or sand stalls for at least 21 wk. The lying behavior was observed, and hock lesions, hoof health, and cleanliness of the cows and stalls were measured. A 5-d preference test between sand and straw stalls was conducted at the end of the experiment. The total daily duration of lying was longer for cows on straw bedding than on sand bedding (straw 749 +/- 16 vs. sand 678 +/- 19 min). During the preference test, cows that had been kept on straw bedding preferred lying in straw stalls [straw 218.7 (133.4 to 239.7) vs. sand 9.0 min (2.8 to 44.8)]; however, cows that had been kept on sand showed no preference [straw 101.3 (51.7 to 205.9) vs. sand 94.3 min (54.1 to 156.1, median and interquartile range)]. Although there were no differences in the dirtiness of stalls, the cows using straw stalls were dirtier than cows using sand stalls [straw 6.04 (5.39 to 6.28) vs. sand 4.19 (3.62 to 5.16)]. At the end of experiment the severity of hock lesions was lower for cows on sand than for cows on straw [sand 0.5 (0.0 to 1.0) vs. straw 1.0 (1.0 to 2.0)]. The improvement in overall hoof health over the observation period was greater for cows kept on sand compared with cows kept on straw [sand -2.00 (-3.75 to -0.25) vs. straw 0.00 (-2.00 to 2.00)]. Straw bedding increased the time that cows spend lying, and cows preferred straw stalls to sand stalls. However, previous experience with sand reduces avoidance of sand stalls. Sand stalls were advantageous for cow cleanliness and health; hock lesions and claw diseases healed more quickly for cows using sand stalls compared with straw.
本实验比较了散栏中沙子和秸秆垫料对奶牛休息时间、清洁度、跗关节损伤及蹄部健康的影响,并测试了奶牛对垫料的偏好是否取决于对该材料的熟悉程度。总共52头奶牛被分别饲养在铺有秸秆的混凝土牛栏或沙地牛栏中至少21周。观察奶牛的躺卧行为,并测量奶牛和牛栏的跗关节病变、蹄部健康状况及清洁度。在实验结束时,对沙地牛栏和秸秆牛栏进行了为期5天的偏好测试。秸秆垫料牛栏中的奶牛每日总躺卧时长比沙地垫料牛栏中的奶牛更长(秸秆垫料牛栏749±16分钟,沙地垫料牛栏678±19分钟)。在偏好测试期间,一直使用秸秆垫料的奶牛更喜欢躺在秸秆牛栏中[秸秆牛栏218.7(133.4至239.7)分钟,沙地牛栏9.0分钟(2.8至44.8)];然而,一直使用沙地垫料的奶牛没有表现出偏好[秸秆牛栏101.3(51.7至205.9)分钟,沙地牛栏94.3分钟(54.1至156.1,中位数和四分位间距)]。尽管牛栏的脏污程度没有差异,但使用秸秆牛栏的奶牛比使用沙地牛栏的奶牛更脏[秸秆牛栏6.04(5.39至6.28),沙地牛栏4.19(3.62至5.16)]。在实验结束时,沙地牛栏中奶牛的跗关节病变严重程度低于秸秆牛栏中的奶牛[沙地牛栏0.5(0.0至1.0),秸秆牛栏1.0(1.0至2.0)]。与使用秸秆垫料的奶牛相比,使用沙地垫料的奶牛在观察期内整体蹄部健康状况的改善更大[沙地垫料-2.00(-3.75至-0.25),秸秆垫料0.00(-2.00至2.00)]。秸秆垫料增加了奶牛的躺卧时间,且奶牛更喜欢秸秆牛栏而非沙地牛栏。然而,先前对沙地的接触减少了对沙地牛栏的回避。沙地牛栏对奶牛的清洁度和健康状况更有利;与秸秆牛栏相比,使用沙地牛栏的奶牛跗关节病变和蹄病愈合得更快。