Department of Production Animal Medicine, PO Box 57, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jan;93(1):70-4. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2164.
Farmers' concerns about the economy, cost of labor, and hygiene have resulted in reduced use of organic bedding in stalls for dairy cows; however, the reduced use of organic bedding possibly impairs cow comfort. The effects of different stall surface materials were evaluated in an unheated building in which only a small amount of bedding was used. The lying time and preferences of 18 cows using 3 stall surface materials (concrete, soft rubber mat, and sand) were compared. All materials were lightly bedded with a small amount of straw, and the amount of straw added to each stall was measured. The cows only had access to stalls of one surface type while their lying time was observed. Lying times were longest on the rubber mats compared with other surfaces (rubber mat 768; concrete 727; sand 707+/-16 min/d). In a preference test, cows had access to 2 of the 3 types of stalls for 10 d and their stall preference was measured. Cows preferred stalls with rubber mats to stalls with a concrete floor (median 73 vs. 18 from a total of 160 observations per day; interquartile range was 27 and 12, respectively), but showed no preference for sand stalls compared with stalls with a concrete floor or with rubber mats. More straw was needed on sand stalls compared with concrete or mat (638+/-13 g/d on sand, 468+/-10 g/d on concrete, and 464+/-8 g/d on rubber mats). Lying times on bedded mats indicated that mats were comfortable for the cows. If availability or cost of bedding material requires limiting the amount of bedding used, rubber mats may help maintain cow comfort.
农民对经济、劳动力成本和卫生的担忧导致用于奶牛牛舍的有机垫料使用减少;然而,有机垫料使用减少可能会损害奶牛的舒适度。在一个仅使用少量垫料的未加热建筑中,评估了不同牛卧床表面材料的效果。比较了 18 头奶牛使用 3 种牛卧床表面材料(混凝土、软橡胶垫和沙子)的卧床时间和偏好。所有材料都用少量稻草轻度铺垫,并测量添加到每个牛舍的稻草量。当观察奶牛的卧床时间时,奶牛只能进入一种表面类型的牛舍。与其他表面相比,橡胶垫上的卧床时间最长(橡胶垫 768;混凝土 727;沙子 707+/-16 分钟/天)。在偏好测试中,奶牛有 10 天可以进入 3 种类型的牛舍中的 2 种,并测量它们对牛舍的偏好。与混凝土地板相比,奶牛更喜欢有橡胶垫的牛舍(每天总共 160 次观察中的中位数 73 次对 18 次;四分位间距分别为 27 次和 12 次),但与混凝土地板或橡胶垫的牛舍相比,它们对沙质牛舍没有偏好。与混凝土或垫料相比,沙质牛舍需要更多的垫料(沙质牛舍 638+/-13 克/天,混凝土牛舍 468+/-10 克/天,橡胶垫料 464+/-8 克/天)。铺有垫料的垫料上的卧床时间表明垫料对奶牛来说很舒适。如果垫料的可用性或成本需要限制使用量,橡胶垫可能有助于维持奶牛的舒适度。