Suppr超能文献

炎性脊髓病与创伤性脊髓损伤:功能和神经学结果的比较

Inflammatory myelopathies and traumatic spinal cord lesions: comparison of functional and neurological outcomes.

作者信息

Scivoletto Giorgio, Cosentino Elena, Mammone Alessia, Molinari Marco

机构信息

Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS S. Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;88(4):471-84. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070049. Epub 2008 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Outcomes knowledge is essential to answer patients' questions regarding function, to plan the use of resources, and to evaluate treatments to enhance recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) with those of patients with inflammatory spinal cord lesions (ISCLs).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The authors evaluated 181 subjects with traumatic SCI and 67 subjects with ISCLs. Using a matching cohorts procedure, 38 subjects were selected from each group. The measures used were the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (motor function), the Barthel Index (BI), the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI).

RESULTS

The subjects in the ISCL group were older than those in the SCI group, with a longer interval from onset of lesion to rehabilitation admission and more incomplete lesions. In the matching cohorts, at admission, the traumatic SCI group had RMI and WISCI scores comparable to those of the ISCL group, but the traumatic SCI group had lower scores on the BI (greater dependence on assistance for activities of daily living). At discharge, the 2 groups had comparable functional outcomes. The neurological status of the 2 groups was comparable at admission and discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The results indicate that, at admission, patients with SCI have a greater physical dependence for assistance with activities of daily living than patients with ISCLs who have comparable neurological status. Such a difference depends on factors not related to the spinal cord lesion, such as the presence of associated lesions, the need to wear an orthotic device, or the sequelae of surgery. The outcomes of patients with SCI are determined more by factors such as lesion level and severity and age than by etiology. This finding could have implications for health care planning and rehabilitation research.

摘要

背景与目的

预后知识对于回答患者关于功能的问题、规划资源利用以及评估治疗以促进康复至关重要。本研究的目的是比较创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者与炎性脊髓病变(ISCLs)患者的预后。

受试者与方法

作者评估了181例创伤性SCI患者和67例ISCLs患者。采用匹配队列程序,从每组中选取38例受试者。所使用的测量指标包括美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表(运动功能)、巴氏指数(BI)、里弗米德活动指数(RMI)以及脊髓损伤步行指数(WISCI)。

结果

ISCLs组的受试者比SCI组的受试者年龄更大,从损伤发作到康复入院的间隔时间更长,且不完全损伤更多。在匹配队列中,入院时,创伤性SCI组的RMI和WISCI评分与ISCLs组相当,但创伤性SCI组的BI评分较低(在日常生活活动中对协助的依赖程度更高)。出院时,两组的功能预后相当。两组在入院和出院时的神经学状态相当。

讨论与结论

结果表明,入院时,与神经学状态相当的ISCLs患者相比,SCI患者在日常生活活动中对协助的身体依赖程度更高。这种差异取决于与脊髓损伤无关的因素,如是否存在相关损伤、是否需要佩戴矫形器械或手术后遗症。SCI患者的预后更多地取决于损伤水平、严重程度和年龄等因素,而非病因。这一发现可能对医疗保健规划和康复研究具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验