• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于监督线性特征提取的互信息最大化

Maximization of mutual information for supervised linear feature extraction.

作者信息

Leiva-Murillo Jose Miguel, Artés-Rodríguez Antonio

机构信息

Department of Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid 28911, Spain.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2007 Sep;18(5):1433-41. doi: 10.1109/tnn.2007.891630.

DOI:10.1109/tnn.2007.891630
PMID:18220191
Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel scheme for linear feature extraction in classification. The method is based on the maximization of the mutual information (MI) between the features extracted and the classes. The sum of the MI corresponding to each of the features is taken as an heuristic that approximates the MI of the whole output vector. Then, a component-by-component gradient-ascent method is proposed for the maximization of the MI, similar to the gradient-based entropy optimization used in independent component analysis (ICA). The simulation results show that not only is the method competitive when compared to existing supervised feature extraction methods in all cases studied, but it also remarkably outperform them when the data are characterized by strongly nonlinear boundaries between classes.

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种用于分类中线性特征提取的新颖方案。该方法基于所提取特征与类别之间互信息(MI)的最大化。将每个特征对应的MI之和作为一种启发式方法,它近似于整个输出向量的MI。然后,提出了一种逐分量梯度上升方法来最大化MI,这类似于独立成分分析(ICA)中基于梯度的熵优化。仿真结果表明,该方法不仅在所有研究的情况下与现有的监督特征提取方法相比具有竞争力,而且当数据的类别之间具有强烈非线性边界时,它还显著优于这些方法。

相似文献

1
Maximization of mutual information for supervised linear feature extraction.用于监督线性特征提取的互信息最大化
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2007 Sep;18(5):1433-41. doi: 10.1109/tnn.2007.891630.
2
Discriminant independent component analysis.判别独立成分分析
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2011 Jun;22(6):845-57. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2011.2122266. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
3
Feature selection based on mutual information and redundancy-synergy coefficient.基于互信息和冗余-协同系数的特征选择
J Zhejiang Univ Sci. 2004 Nov;5(11):1382-91. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2004.1382.
4
Maximization of mutual information for offline Thai handwriting recognition.用于离线泰语手写识别的互信息最大化
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Aug;28(8):1347-51. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.167.
5
Face recognition using recursive Fisher linear discriminant.使用递归Fisher线性判别式的人脸识别。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006 Aug;15(8):2097-105. doi: 10.1109/tip.2006.875225.
6
On feature extraction via kernels.关于通过核函数进行特征提取
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008 Apr;38(2):553-7. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.913604.
7
A tree-structure mutual information-based feature extraction and its application to EEG-based brain-computer interfacing.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:5075-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353481.
8
On classification with incomplete data.关于不完全数据的分类
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2007 Mar;29(3):427-36. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.52.
9
Estimating optimal feature subsets using efficient estimation of high-dimensional mutual information.使用高维互信息的有效估计来估计最优特征子集。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2005 Jan;16(1):213-24. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2004.841414.
10
From blind signal extraction to blind instantaneous signal separation: criteria, algorithms, and stability.从盲信号提取到盲瞬时信号分离:准则、算法与稳定性
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2004 Jul;15(4):859-73. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2004.828764.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancement of early cervical cancer diagnosis with epithelial layer analysis of fluorescence lifetime images.通过荧光寿命图像的上皮层分析提高早期宫颈癌诊断水平
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0125706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125706. eCollection 2015.
2
The utility of data-driven feature selection: re: Chu et al. 2012.数据驱动型特征选择的实用性:Chu 等人,2012。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:1107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.050. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
3
Comparison of classification methods for P300 brain-computer interface on disabled subjects.
基于残疾受试者的 P300 脑机接口分类方法的比较。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:519868. doi: 10.1155/2011/519868. Epub 2011 Sep 18.