Sengupta Shomik, Amling Christopher, D'Amico Anthony V, Blute Michael L
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):821-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.023. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
We review the usefulness of prostate specific antigen kinetics (ie prostate specific antigen velocity and doubling time) in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.
The MEDLINE database was searched to identify studies investigating prostate specific antigen kinetics in patients with prostate cancer.
Various techniques are available for estimating prostate specific antigen kinetics, but to minimize the impact of prostate specific antigen variability on such calculations at least a 90-day period and preferably more than 2 measurements should be used. There is little to suggest which measure of prostate specific antigen kinetics may be superior since both appear to provide useful prognostic information. Prostate specific antigen velocity is easier to calculate but prostate specific antigen doubling time may have greater biological justification. Retrospective studies show that before treatment prostate specific antigen kinetics provide prognostic information regarding the risk of treatment failure and subsequent death from cancer. Additionally, in patients treated surgically preoperative prostate specific antigen kinetics predict the risk of adverse pathology, while in those undergoing conservative treatment prostate specific antigen kinetics are associated with the risk of progression and need for intervention. In patients with biochemical failure after therapy prostate specific antigen kinetics predict the risk and potential site of clinical recurrence, the likely response to salvage therapy, and the risk of death from cancer. Preliminary assessments also suggest that prostate specific antigen kinetics may serve as a surrogate end point to replace cancer specific mortality.
Although prospective studies are lacking, the current literature suggests that prostate specific antigen kinetics provide valuable prognostic information, and should be further evaluated in clinical decision making and as a surrogate end point for future trials.
我们回顾前列腺特异性抗原动力学(即前列腺特异性抗原速度和倍增时间)在前列腺癌患者治疗中的作用。
检索MEDLINE数据库以识别研究前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原动力学的研究。
有多种技术可用于估计前列腺特异性抗原动力学,但为了尽量减少前列腺特异性抗原变异性对此类计算的影响,应至少使用90天的时间段,最好进行超过2次测量。几乎没有证据表明哪种前列腺特异性抗原动力学指标可能更优,因为两者似乎都能提供有用的预后信息。前列腺特异性抗原速度更容易计算,但前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间可能具有更强的生物学依据。回顾性研究表明,在治疗前,前列腺特异性抗原动力学可提供有关治疗失败风险和随后癌症死亡风险的预后信息。此外,在接受手术治疗的患者中,术前前列腺特异性抗原动力学可预测不良病理的风险,而在接受保守治疗的患者中,前列腺特异性抗原动力学与疾病进展风险和干预需求相关。在治疗后出现生化复发的患者中,前列腺特异性抗原动力学可预测临床复发的风险和潜在部位、挽救治疗的可能反应以及癌症死亡风险。初步评估还表明,前列腺特异性抗原动力学可作为替代终点来取代癌症特异性死亡率。
尽管缺乏前瞻性研究,但当前文献表明前列腺特异性抗原动力学可提供有价值的预后信息,应在临床决策中进一步评估,并作为未来试验的替代终点。