Suppr超能文献

反应准备中的线索有效性效应:一项瞳孔测量研究。

Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.

作者信息

Moresi Sofie, Adam Jos J, Rijcken Jons, Van Gerven Pascal W M

机构信息

Department of Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2008 Feb 27;1196:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.026. Epub 2007 Dec 23.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of cue validity and cue difficulty on response preparation to provide a test of the Grouping Model [Adam, J.J., Hommel, B. and Umiltà, C., 2003. Preparing for perception and action (I): the role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm. Cognit. Psychol. 46(3), 302-58, Adam, J.J., Hommel, B. and Umiltà, C., 2005. Preparing for perception and action (II) automatic and effortful processes in response cuing. Vis. Cogn. 12(8), 1444-1473.]. We used the pupillary response to index the cognitive processing load during and after the preparatory interval (2 s). Twenty-two participants performed the finger-cuing tasks with valid (75%) and invalid (25%) cues. Results showed longer reaction times, more errors, and larger pupil dilations for invalid than valid cues. During the preparation interval, pupil dilation varied systematically with cue difficulty, with easy cues (specifying 2 fingers on 1 hand) showing less pupil dilation than difficult cues (specifying 2 fingers on 2 hands). After the preparation interval, this pattern of differential pupil dilation as a function of cue difficulty reversed for invalid cues, suggesting that cues which incorrectly specified fingers on one hand required more effortful reprogramming operations than cues which incorrectly specified fingers on two hands. These outcomes were consistent with predictions derived from the Grouping Model. Finally, all participants exhibited two distinct pupil dilation strategies: an "early" strategy in which the onset of the main pupil dilation was tied to onset of the cue, and a "late" strategy in which the onset of the main pupil dilation was tied to the onset of the target. Thus, whereas the early pupil dilation strategy showed a strong dilation during the preparation interval, the late pupil strategy showed a strong constriction. Interestingly, only the late onset pupil dilation strategy revealed the above reported sensitivity to cue difficulty, showing for the first time that the well-known pupil's sensitivity to task difficulty can also emerge when the pupil is constricting instead of dilating.

摘要

本研究考察了线索有效性和线索难度对反应准备的影响,以检验分组模型[亚当,J.J.,霍梅尔,B.和乌米塔,C.,2003年。为感知和行动做准备(I):分组在反应线索范式中的作用。《认知心理学》46(3),302 - 58页,亚当,J.J.,霍梅尔,B.和乌米塔,C.,2005年。为感知和行动做准备(II)反应线索中的自动和努力过程。《视觉认知》12(8),1444 - 1473页]。我们使用瞳孔反应来指示准备间隔(2秒)期间及之后的认知加工负荷。22名参与者执行手指线索任务,线索有效(75%)和无效(25%)。结果显示,与有效线索相比,无效线索的反应时间更长、错误更多且瞳孔扩张更大。在准备间隔期间,瞳孔扩张随线索难度有系统地变化,简单线索(指定一只手上的2根手指)的瞳孔扩张比困难线索(指定两只手上的2根手指)小。在准备间隔之后,无效线索的这种随线索难度变化的瞳孔扩张差异模式发生了逆转,这表明错误指定一只手上手指的线索比错误指定两只手上手指的线索需要更费力的重新编程操作。这些结果与从分组模型得出的预测一致。最后,所有参与者都表现出两种不同的瞳孔扩张策略:一种“早期”策略,其中主要瞳孔扩张的开始与线索的开始相关联;另一种“晚期”策略,其中主要瞳孔扩张的开始与目标的开始相关联。因此,早期瞳孔扩张策略在准备间隔期间显示出强烈的扩张,而晚期瞳孔策略显示出强烈的收缩。有趣的是,只有晚期开始的瞳孔扩张策略显示出上述对线索难度的敏感性,首次表明当瞳孔收缩而非扩张时,瞳孔对任务难度的众所周知的敏感性也会出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验