Adam Jos J, Pratt Jay
Department of Movement Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
In a series of three experiments, we examined facilitatory and inhibitory effects of uninformative spatial cues in a four-choice reaction time (RT) task that required three different types of responses: detection, reaching, and keypressing. Results revealed a pattern of facilitation and inhibition that strongly depended on response mode: Whereas detection and reaching showed longer RTs for cued than uncued locations (reflecting inhibition of return), keypress responses showed shorter RTs for cued than uncued locations (reflecting automatic response activation). Together, these results provide converging evidence for the Grouping model of precuing effects [Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2003). Preparing for perception and action (I): The role of grouping in the response-cuing task. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 302-358; Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Preparing for perception and action (II): Automatic and effortful processes in response-cuing. Visual Cognition, 12, 1444-1473].
在一系列三个实验中，我们在一项四选一反应时（RT）任务中考察了无信息空间线索的促进和抑制作用，该任务需要三种不同类型的反应：检测、伸手和按键。结果揭示了一种促进和抑制模式，该模式强烈依赖于反应模式：检测和伸手在有线索提示的位置比无线索提示的位置表现出更长的反应时（反映返回抑制），而按键反应在有线索提示的位置比无线索提示的位置表现出更短的反应时（反映自动反应激活）。总之，这些结果为预线索效应的分组模型提供了一致的证据[亚当，J. J.，霍梅尔，B.，& 乌米塔，C.（2003年）。为感知和行动做准备（I）：分组在反应线索任务中的作用。认知心理学，46，302 - 358；亚当，J. J.，霍梅尔，B.，& 乌米塔，C.（2005年）。为感知和行动做准备（II）：反应线索中的自动和努力过程。视觉认知，12，1444 - 1473]。
