• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑制过程介导扫视目标选择。

Inhibitory processes mediate saccadic target selection.

作者信息

Nelson Michael D, Hughes Howard C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Missouri University of Science and Technology, 110 HSS, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Dec;105(3 Pt 1):939-58. doi: 10.2466/pms.105.3.939-958.

DOI:10.2466/pms.105.3.939-958
PMID:18229549
Abstract

Observers (N = 3, all males, M age = 30.7 yr.) were presented pairs of visual targets and instructed to fixate one as quickly as possible. The resulting saccades were of two types; bistable saccades accurately acquired one of the targets whereas averaging saccades landed at intermediate locations. The hypothesis was that averaging saccades result from a pooling of afferent activity prior to selection of saccadic direction and amplitude (i.e., coactive parallel processing) and that bistable saccades would show evidence of response competition between incompatible motor programs within a parallel architecture. Analysis of the distributions of saccadic reaction times showed that in all cases saccadic responses to double targets were too slow to be consistent with either the channel summation or any form of race model. Results indicate that inhibitory interactions operate during the selection of a target for a saccadic eye movement.

摘要

观察者(N = 3,均为男性,平均年龄 = 30.7岁)观看成对的视觉目标,并被要求尽快注视其中一个。由此产生的扫视有两种类型;双稳态扫视能准确地获取其中一个目标,而平均化扫视则落在中间位置。假设是平均化扫视是在选择扫视方向和幅度之前传入活动汇聚的结果(即共同激活的并行处理),并且双稳态扫视将显示在并行架构内不相容运动程序之间存在反应竞争的证据。对扫视反应时间分布的分析表明,在所有情况下,对双目标的扫视反应都太慢,与通道总和或任何形式的竞争模型均不一致。结果表明,在选择眼跳目标的过程中存在抑制性相互作用。

相似文献

1
Inhibitory processes mediate saccadic target selection.抑制过程介导扫视目标选择。
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Dec;105(3 Pt 1):939-58. doi: 10.2466/pms.105.3.939-958.
2
Vying for dominance: dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus.争夺主导地位:动态相互作用控制上丘中的视觉注视和扫视起始
Prog Brain Res. 2002;140:3-19. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)40039-8.
3
On the effect of remote and proximal distractors on saccadic behavior: a challenge to neural-field models.关于远距和近距干扰物对眼跳行为的影响:对神经场模型的挑战。
J Vis. 2012 Nov 26;12(12):14. doi: 10.1167/12.12.14.
4
Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation.用于眼跳反应时间的整合时间窗口(TWIN)模型:听觉掩蔽水平对垂直方向上视觉-听觉空间交互作用的影响
Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0091-8. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
5
Attention modulates saccadic inhibition magnitude.注意力调节眼跳抑制的幅度。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Jun;66(6):1051-9. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.797001. Epub 2013 May 16.
6
Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.扫视语境指示视觉固视内的信息处理:来自相关事件电位和眼动分析的分心效应证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Apr;80(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
7
The time course of saccadic decision making: dynamic field theory.扫视决策的时间进程:动态场理论
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1059-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
8
Eye position effects in saccadic adaptation.眼位对扫视适应的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;106(5):2536-45. doi: 10.1152/jn.00023.2011. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
9
Neural mechanisms underlying target selection with saccadic eye movements.眼跳运动中目标选择的神经机制。
Prog Brain Res. 2005;149:157-71. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49012-3.
10
A model of the saccade-generating system that accounts for trajectory variations produced by competing visual stimuli.一种扫视生成系统模型,该模型解释了由竞争性视觉刺激产生的轨迹变化。
Biol Cybern. 2005 Jan;92(1):21-37. doi: 10.1007/s00422-004-0526-y. Epub 2004 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Pinna cues determine orienting response modes to synchronous sounds in elevation.耳廓线索决定了对同步声音在垂直方向上的定向反应模式。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 6;30(1):194-204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2982-09.2010.