Dickerson Sally S, Mycek Peggy J, Zaldivar Frank
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine 92697-7085, USA.
Health Psychol. 2008 Jan;27(1):116-21. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.116.
Recent research has supported the premise that performance conditions characterized by social-evaluative threat, in which an aspect of the self could be judged by others, are associated with cortisol responses. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is due to negative social evaluation per se or simply the presence of another during a performance situation.
In the present study, 89 undergraduates delivered a speech in 1 of 3 conditions: in front of an evaluative audience panel (social-evaluative threat [SET]), in the presence of an inattentive confederate (PRES), or alone in a room (non-SET).
Consistent with hypotheses, participants in the SET condition demonstrated a significant cortisol response, while those in the non-SET and PRES conditions did not show increases in this hormone. Further, participants in the SET condition who reported greater posttask levels of self-conscious cognitions and emotions demonstrated the greatest increases in cortisol.
These findings suggest that the mere social presence of others is not driving the changes in cortisol observed under social-evaluative threat; instead, explicit negative social evaluation may be responsible for increases in this health-relevant physiological parameter.
近期研究支持了这样一种前提,即具有社会评价性威胁特征的表现情境(在这种情境中自我的某个方面可能会被他人评判)与皮质醇反应有关。然而,尚不清楚这种效应是由于负面社会评价本身,还是仅仅因为在表现情境中有他人在场。
在本研究中,89名本科生在三种条件之一的情况下发表演讲:面对一个评价性的观众小组(社会评价性威胁[SET])、在一个不专心的同伴面前(PRES)或独自在一个房间里(非SET)。
与假设一致,SET条件下的参与者表现出显著的皮质醇反应,而非SET和PRES条件下的参与者该激素水平没有升高。此外,在SET条件下报告任务后自我意识认知和情绪水平较高的参与者,其皮质醇升高幅度最大。
这些发现表明,他人的单纯在场并不是导致在社会评价性威胁下观察到的皮质醇变化的原因;相反,明确的负面社会评价可能是导致这种与健康相关的生理参数升高的原因。