Indelicato Daniel J, Keole Sameer R, Shahlaee Amir H, Shi Wenyin, Morris Christopher G, Gibbs C Parker, Scarborough Mark T, Marcus Robert B
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0385, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.014. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
This retrospective analysis describes our 35-year experience with respect to disease control and functional status.
Thirty-five patients with localized Ewing tumors of the pelvis and sacral bones were treated from 1970 to 2005. Twenty-six patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), and 9 patients were treated with combined local therapy in the form of surgery + RT. The median RT dose was 55.2 Gy. The patients who received RT alone were more likely to be older men with larger tumors exhibiting soft-tissue extension. Patients in the definitive RT group were more likely to receive etoposide and ifosfamide or undergo bone marrow transplant. Median potential follow-up was 19.4 years.
The 15-year actuarial cause-specific survival, freedom from relapse rate, and local control rates were 26% vs. 76% (p = 0.016), 28% vs. 78% (p = 0.015), and 64% vs. 100% (p = 0.087), respectively, for patients treated with definitive RT and combined therapy. Overall, tumors <8 cm had significantly better cause-specific survival, but this was unrelated to local control. The median Toronto Extremity Salvage Score for the definitive RT and combined therapy groups were 99 and 94, respectively (p = 0.19). Seven definitive RT patients (27%) had serious complications.
Combined modality local therapy should be considered if pelvic Ewing tumors are resectable. However, because of the extent of local disease, most patients have unresectable or partially resectable tumors and therefore require RT in some capacity. For this reason, innovative RT strategies are needed to improve long-term disease outcomes and minimize side effects while maintaining an acceptable functional result.
本回顾性分析描述了我们在疾病控制和功能状态方面35年的经验。
1970年至2005年期间,对35例骨盆和骶骨局限性尤因肿瘤患者进行了治疗。26例患者接受了根治性放疗(RT),9例患者接受了手术+RT形式的联合局部治疗。RT的中位剂量为55.2 Gy。单独接受RT的患者更可能是年龄较大的男性,肿瘤较大且有软组织侵犯。根治性RT组的患者更可能接受依托泊苷和异环磷酰胺治疗或进行骨髓移植。中位潜在随访时间为19.4年。
根治性RT组和联合治疗组患者的15年精算特定病因生存率、无复发率和局部控制率分别为26%对76%(p = 0.016)、28%对78%(p = 0.015)和64%对100%(p = 0.087)。总体而言,肿瘤<8 cm的患者特定病因生存率显著更高,但这与局部控制无关。根治性RT组和联合治疗组的多伦多肢体挽救评分中位数分别为99分和94分(p = 0.19)。7例根治性RT患者(27%)出现严重并发症。
如果骨盆尤因肿瘤可切除,应考虑联合局部治疗。然而,由于局部病变范围,大多数患者的肿瘤不可切除或部分可切除,因此需要某种形式的RT。因此,需要创新的RT策略来改善长期疾病结局,在维持可接受功能结果的同时尽量减少副作用。