Zaidat O O, Klucznik R, Alexander M J, Chaloupka J, Lutsep H, Barnwell S, Mawad M, Lane B, Lynn M J, Chimowitz M
Associate Medical College of Wisconsin/Froedtert Hospital, 9200 W Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Neurology. 2008 Apr 22;70(17):1518-24. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000306308.08229.a3. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial showed that patients with symptomatic 70% to 99% intracranial arterial stenosis are at particularly high risk of ipsilateral stroke on medical therapy: 18% at 1 year (95% CI = 3% to 24%). The Wingspan intracranial stent is another therapeutic option but there are limited data on the technical success of stenting and outcome of patients with 70% to 99% stenosis treated with a Wingspan stent.
Sixteen medical centers enrolled consecutive patients treated with a Wingspan stent in this registry between November 2005 and October 2006. Data on stenting indication, severity of stenosis, technical success (stent placement across the target lesion with <50% residual stenosis), follow-up angiography, and outcome were collected.
A total of 129 patients with symptomatic 70% to 99% intracranial stenosis were enrolled. The technical success rate was 96.7%. The mean pre and post-stent stenoses were 82% and 20%. The frequency of any stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or death within 30 days or ipsilateral stroke beyond 30 days was 14.0% at 6 months (95% CI = 8.7% to 22.1%). The frequency of >or=50% restenosis on follow-up angiography was 13/52 (25%).
The use of a Wingspan stent in patients with severe intracranial stenosis is relatively safe with high rate of technical success with moderately high rate of restenosis. Comparison of the event rates in high-risk patients in Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) vs this registry do not rule out either that stenting could be associated with a substantial relative risk reduction (e.g., 50%) or has no advantage compared with medical therapy. A randomized trial comparing stenting with medical therapy is needed.
华法林 - 阿司匹林治疗有症状颅内疾病(WASID)试验表明,有症状的颅内动脉狭窄70%至99%的患者接受药物治疗时同侧卒中风险特别高:1年时为18%(95%可信区间 = 3%至24%)。Wingspan颅内支架是另一种治疗选择,但关于支架置入技术成功率以及接受Wingspan支架治疗的70%至99%狭窄患者的预后数据有限。
2005年11月至2006年10月期间,16个医疗中心将连续接受Wingspan支架治疗的患者纳入本登记研究。收集有关支架置入指征、狭窄严重程度、技术成功率(支架跨越靶病变置入且残余狭窄<50%)、随访血管造影及预后的数据。
共纳入129例有症状的颅内狭窄70%至99%的患者。技术成功率为96.7%。支架置入前后平均狭窄率分别为82%和20%。6个月时30天内任何卒中、脑出血或死亡或30天后同侧卒中的发生率为14.0%(95%可信区间 = 8.7%至22.1%)。随访血管造影显示再狭窄≥50%的发生率为13/52(25%)。
在严重颅内狭窄患者中使用Wingspan支架相对安全,技术成功率高,但再狭窄率中等偏高。比较华法林 - 阿司匹林治疗有症状颅内疾病(WASID)试验与本登记研究中高危患者的事件发生率,既不能排除支架置入可能与相对风险大幅降低(如50%)相关,也不能排除与药物治疗相比无优势。需要进行一项比较支架置入与药物治疗的随机试验。