Levina Aviva, Lay Peter A
Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Mar;21(3):563-71. doi: 10.1021/tx700385t. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
The status of Cr(III) as an essential micronutrient for humans is currently under question. No functional Cr(III)-containing biomolecules have been definitively described as yet, and accumulated experience in the use of Cr(III) nutritional supplements (such as [Cr(pic) 3], where pic = 2-pyridinecarboxylato) has shown no measurable benefits for nondiabetic people. Although the use of large doses of Cr(III) supplements may lead to improvements in glucose metabolism for type 2 diabetics, there is a growing concern over the possible genotoxicity of these compounds, particularly of [Cr(pic) 3]. The current perspective discusses chemical transformations of Cr(III) nutritional supplements in biological media, with implications for both beneficial and toxic actions of Cr(III) complexes, which are likely to arise from the same biochemical mechanisms, dependent on concentrations of the reactive species. These species include: (i) partial hydrolysis products of Cr(III) nutritional supplements, which are capable of binding to biological macromolecules and altering their functions; and (ii) highly reactive Cr(VI/V/IV) species and organic radicals, formed in reactions of Cr(III) with biological oxidants. Low concentrations of these species are likely to cause alterations in cell signaling (including enhancement of insulin signaling) through interactions with the active centers of regulatory enzymes in the cell membrane or in the cytoplasm, while higher concentrations are likely to produce genotoxic DNA lesions in the cell nucleus. These data suggest that the potential for genotoxic side-effects of Cr(III) complexes may outweigh their possible benefits as insulin enhancers, and that recommendations for their use as either nutritional supplements or antidiabetic drugs need to be reconsidered in light of these recent findings.
铬(III)作为人体必需的微量营养素的地位目前受到质疑。尚未明确描述任何含铬(III)的功能性生物分子,并且在使用铬(III)营养补充剂(如[Cr(pic)3],其中pic = 2-吡啶羧酸根)方面积累的经验表明,对非糖尿病患者没有可测量的益处。虽然大剂量使用铬(III)补充剂可能会改善2型糖尿病患者的葡萄糖代谢,但人们越来越担心这些化合物,特别是[Cr(pic)3]的潜在遗传毒性。当前的观点讨论了铬(III)营养补充剂在生物介质中的化学转化,这对铬(III)配合物的有益和毒性作用都有影响,这些作用可能源于相同的生化机制,取决于反应性物种的浓度。这些物种包括:(i)铬(III)营养补充剂的部分水解产物,它们能够与生物大分子结合并改变其功能;(ii)在铬(III)与生物氧化剂的反应中形成的高活性铬(VI / V / IV)物种和有机自由基。低浓度的这些物种可能通过与细胞膜或细胞质中调节酶的活性中心相互作用而导致细胞信号传导改变(包括胰岛素信号传导增强),而较高浓度可能在细胞核中产生遗传毒性DNA损伤。这些数据表明,铬(III)配合物的潜在遗传毒性副作用可能超过其作为胰岛素增强剂的可能益处,并且鉴于这些最新发现,需要重新考虑将其用作营养补充剂或抗糖尿病药物的建议。