Burow Annika, Schwerzmann Markus, Wallmann Dieter, Tanner Hildegard, Sakata Takao, Windecker Stephan, Meier Bernhard, Delacrétaz Etienne
Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Cardiology. 2008;111(1):47-50. doi: 10.1159/000113427. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
Recurrent embolic events after device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) have been related to incomplete closure. Another cause could be atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of AF in stroke patients after PFO closure.
Consecutive patients with device closure of a PFO after a stroke or transient ischemic attack and control patients with stroke underwent 7-day event loop recordings 3 and 6 months after PFO closure or stroke, respectively.
Forty patients treated by PFO device closure 96 +/- 68 days after cryptogenic ischemic stroke and 70 control patients with ischemic stroke of other etiologies (known AF excluded) were compared. AF was identified in 6 patients (15%) of the treated group and in 12 control patients (17%, p = 0.77). In multivariate analysis, the presence of an occluder device was not an independent risk factor for AF.
The incidence of AF is high after device closure of a PFO in stroke patients and similar to that in patients with stroke of non-PFO etiology and, hence, with no device. Further studies are required to determine the risk of thromboembolism and the optimal treatment in patients developing AF after device closure of a PFO.
卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术后复发性栓塞事件与封堵不完全有关。另一个原因可能是心房颤动(AF)。本研究的目的是确定PFO封堵术后中风患者中AF的发生率。
中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后接受PFO封堵术的连续患者以及中风对照患者分别在PFO封堵或中风后3个月和6个月进行为期7天的事件环记录。
比较了40例在隐源性缺血性中风后96±68天接受PFO封堵装置治疗的患者和70例其他病因(排除已知AF)的缺血性中风对照患者。治疗组中有6例患者(15%)发现AF,对照组中有12例患者(17%,p = 0.77)发现AF。在多变量分析中,封堵器装置的存在不是AF的独立危险因素。
中风患者PFO封堵术后AF的发生率很高,与非PFO病因的中风患者相似,因此没有使用装置。需要进一步研究以确定PFO封堵术后发生AF的患者的血栓栓塞风险和最佳治疗方法。