Borghesio Luca
Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066), University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607-7060, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):384-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00872.x. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
Indigenous tribes and conservation biologists may have common goals and may be able to collaborate on the maintenance of biodiversity, but few researchers have evaluated the impacts and potential benefits of human subsistence activities. I studied the effects of subsistence activities (primarily wood collection) of nomadic pastoralists in 3 Afromontane forests of northern Kenya. In surveys of 404, 25-m-radius plots, I recorded vegetation structure and composition of the forest bird community. Plots with higher levels of human activity had significantly different vegetation structure, with more-open canopies, more grass, and fewer tree stems. Nectarivores (abundance +231%) and aerial insectivores (+66%) were more abundant in plots with more-intense wood collecting than in plots with less human activity, whereas abundance of forest specialists (-28%) decreased in plots with more-intense human activity. Abundance of 58% of the bird species either increased or decreased significantly in plots with more-intense human activity. Generally, the number of individuals of forest specialists decreased (6 of 7 species showed significant responses) and the number of individuals of edge and nonforest species increased with increasing human activity. Canonical correspondence analysis showed that an intensification of human activities would favor nectarivores, aerial insectivores, granivores, and omnivores and would negatively affect large-sized, ground-foraging species and arboreal frugivores. Subsistence human activities favored the invasion of forest by edge species at the expense of forest specialists; thus, further intensification of forest exploitation by local peoples is not recommended. At the same time, however, subsistence activities in northern Kenya forests appeared to increase the structural diversity of the vegetation and provided suitable habitat for part (but not all) of the forest avifauna, which suggests that subsistence human activities may have a role in the maintenance of bird diversity.
本土部落和保护生物学家可能有共同目标,并且或许能够在生物多样性维护方面展开合作,但很少有研究人员评估人类生存活动的影响和潜在益处。我研究了肯尼亚北部3个山地森林中游牧牧民的生存活动(主要是木材采集)的影响。在对404个半径为25米的样地进行调查时,我记录了森林鸟类群落的植被结构和组成。人类活动水平较高的样地具有显著不同的植被结构,树冠更开阔,草本植物更多,树干更少。与人类活动较少的样地相比,木材采集强度较大的样地中食蜜鸟(数量增加231%)和食虫飞鸟(数量增加66%)更为丰富,而在人类活动强度较大的样地中,森林特有物种的数量(减少28%)有所下降。在人类活动强度较大的样地中,58%的鸟类物种数量要么显著增加,要么显著减少。总体而言,随着人类活动增加,森林特有物种的个体数量减少(7个物种中有6个表现出显著反应),边缘物种和非森林物种的个体数量增加。典范对应分析表明,人类活动的强化将有利于食蜜鸟、食虫飞鸟、食谷鸟和杂食动物,并将对大型地面觅食物种和树栖食果动物产生负面影响。人类生存活动有利于边缘物种入侵森林,而以森林特有物种为代价;因此,不建议当地居民进一步强化森林开发。然而,与此同时,肯尼亚北部森林中的生存活动似乎增加了植被的结构多样性,并为部分(但不是全部)森林鸟类提供了适宜栖息地,这表明人类生存活动可能在鸟类多样性维护中发挥作用。