Prasan Ananth M, Ison Glen, Rees David M
Department of Cardiology St George Hospital, Level 1, Clinical Services Building, Gray Street, Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2008 Jun;17(3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
Coronary angiography and angioplasty have to date been performed using digital angiography and fluoroscopic systems which incorporate an image intensifier (II). More recently flat-panel (FP) detectors have been introduced which are thought to improve spatial resolution. However, there is limited data on the effect of flat-panel detection on radiation exposure. We sought to determine the impact of flat-panel on cumulative radiation exposure in patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty at our institution.
Patients who underwent elective coronary angioplasty in the six months prior to and following upgrade of our Toshiba catheterisation laboratory from image intensifier to flat-panel were included. Demographic and radiation data were collected prospectively and the same five operators performed interventions during the 12-month period. Radiation data was obtained from the dose-area product meter intrinsic to the fluoroscopy system.
One hundred and thirty seven patients underwent elective angioplasty over the 12-month period (68 II, 69 FP). Cumulative radiation exposure was increased in flat-panel cases (99, 129 Gy cm(2) versus 71, 77 Gy cm(2), p=0.001). This increase was independent of patient weight (78+/-15 kg versus 78+/-17 kg, p=NS), screening time (19+/-12 min versus 18+/-13 min, p=NS) and total number of digital acquisitions (1475, 820 versus 1668, 1365, p=NS). The total amount of contrast dye did not differ between flat-panel and image intensifier cases (195+/-76 ml versus 194+/-79 ml, p=NS).
Adoption of flat-panel detector technology increases radiation exposure. This may have important safety implications for catheterisation laboratory staff and patients undergoing multiple interventional procedures.
迄今为止,冠状动脉造影和血管成形术一直使用包含影像增强器(II)的数字血管造影和荧光透视系统来进行。最近,平板(FP)探测器已被引入,人们认为它能提高空间分辨率。然而,关于平板探测对辐射暴露影响的数据有限。我们试图确定平板对在我们机构接受择期冠状动脉血管成形术患者的累积辐射暴露的影响。
纳入在我们东芝导管实验室从影像增强器升级到平板之前和之后六个月内接受择期冠状动脉血管成形术的患者。前瞻性收集人口统计学和辐射数据,并且在这12个月期间由相同的五名操作人员进行干预。辐射数据从荧光透视系统固有的剂量面积积仪中获取。
在这12个月期间,137例患者接受了择期血管成形术(68例使用影像增强器,69例使用平板)。平板病例的累积辐射暴露增加(分别为99、129 Gy cm² 与71、77 Gy cm²,p = 0.001)。这种增加与患者体重无关(分别为78±15 kg与78±17 kg,p无统计学意义)、筛查时间无关(分别为19±12分钟与18±13分钟,p无统计学意义)以及数字采集总数无关(分别为1475、820与1668、1365,p无统计学意义)。平板和影像增强器病例之间的造影剂总量没有差异(分别为195±76 ml与194±79 ml,p无统计学意义)。
采用平板探测器技术会增加辐射暴露。这可能对导管实验室工作人员和接受多次介入手术的患者具有重要的安全意义。