Levin David C, Rao Vijay M, Parker Laurence, Frangos Andrea J, Sunshine Jonathan H
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Feb;5(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.09.017.
To study growth trends in the ownership of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations by nonradiologist physicians who either own the equipment outright or are involved in scan leasing arrangements.
Medicare Part B data sets from 2000 through 2005 were reviewed, and procedure codes for MRI examinations were selected. The focus was on only those procedures performed at nonhospital, private-office facilities. Using Medicare's physician specialty codes, all such studies were categorized according to the specialties of the physicians who performed them. Ownership was determined by including only those claims for global or technical-component-only reimbursement. Physicians owning or leasing MRI facilities would use one or the other of these two types of claims. Professional-component-only claims were not included. Procedure volumes and growth trends were compared among radiologists and other specialists.
From 2000 to 2005, private-office MRI examinations performed by radiologists increased by 83%. During the same period, private-office MRI examinations performed by nonradiologist physicians, either through owning or leasing the equipment, increased by 254%. Excluding studies performed by independent diagnostic testing facilities (for which physician ownership cannot be determined), nonradiologists' share of the private-office MRI market rose from 11% in 2000 to 20% in 2005. The nonradiologic specialties most actively involved in performing MRI were orthopedic surgery (161,296 Medicare studies in 2005), neurology (63,363 studies), primary care (58,092 studies), internal medicine subspecialties (34,317 studies), and neurosurgery (20,712 studies).
In the private-office setting in 2005, radiologists performed most MRI examinations. However, the growth rate from 2000 to 2005 among nonradiologist physicians was far higher, 254% compared with 83% among radiologists. Because scans performed by nonradiologists through ownership or leasing are subject to self-referral, the much more rapid growth among those physicians should be of concern to policymakers and payers.
研究完全拥有设备或参与扫描租赁安排的非放射科医生进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查的所有权增长趋势。
回顾了2000年至2005年医疗保险B部分数据集,并选择了MRI检查的程序代码。重点仅关注在非医院私人诊所设施中进行的那些程序。使用医疗保险的医生专业代码,所有此类研究均根据进行研究的医生的专业进行分类。所有权通过仅包括那些全球或仅技术组件报销的索赔来确定。拥有或租赁MRI设施的医生将使用这两种索赔类型中的一种或另一种。仅专业组件的索赔不包括在内。比较了放射科医生和其他专科医生的程序量和增长趋势。
从2000年到2005年,放射科医生在私人诊所进行的MRI检查增加了83%。在同一时期,非放射科医生通过拥有或租赁设备在私人诊所进行的MRI检查增加了254%。不包括独立诊断测试机构进行的研究(无法确定医生所有权),非放射科医生在私人诊所MRI市场中的份额从2000年的11%上升到2005年的20%。最积极参与进行MRI检查的非放射科专业是整形外科(2005年有161,296项医疗保险研究)、神经病学(63,363项研究)、初级保健(58,092项研究)、内科亚专业(34,317项研究)和神经外科(20,712项研究)。
2005年在私人诊所环境中,放射科医生进行了大多数MRI检查。然而,2000年至2005年期间非放射科医生的增长率要高得多,分别为254%和83%。由于非放射科医生通过拥有或租赁进行的扫描存在自我转诊问题,这些医生中更快的增长速度应引起政策制定者和支付方的关注。