Lombas Andrés S, Alonso Gumersinda, Rodríguez Gabriel
Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Avenida de Tolosa, 70, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain.
Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 8.
Four groups of rats received stimulus pre-exposure under conditions intended to produce different opportunities for stimulus comparison to occur. Groups AX/BX-L and AX/BX-S received alternating presentations of two compound flavors (AX and BX); the interval between these presentations was long (24 h) for group AX/BX-L, and short (5 min) for group AX/BX-S. Groups AX-L and AX-S matched groups AX/BX-L and AX/BX-S in their pre-exposure conditions except that they received presentations of water rather than presentations of BX. The effective salience of one of the unique stimulus features (A) was then assessed by using this flavor as a conditioned stimulus in a flavor-aversion procedure. It was found that aversion to A was learned about more readily after pre-exposure to AX and BX than after pre-exposure just to AX. However, there was no indication that the rate of conditioning to A was affected by the temporal interval between the presentations of AX and BX. These findings challenge the notion that stimulus comparison engages a process responsible for an increase in the salience of the unique stimulus features, but can be accommodated by the salience modulation mechanism proposed by Hall [Hall, G., 2003. Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: associative and nonassociative mechanisms. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 56, 43-55].
四组大鼠在旨在产生不同刺激比较机会的条件下接受刺激预暴露。AX/BX-L组和AX/BX-S组接受两种复合味道(AX和BX)的交替呈现;AX/BX-L组的这些呈现之间的间隔较长(24小时),而AX/BX-S组的间隔较短(5分钟)。AX-L组和AX-S组在预暴露条件上与AX/BX-L组和AX/BX-S组相匹配,只是它们接受的是水的呈现而不是BX的呈现。然后,通过在味道厌恶程序中使用这种味道作为条件刺激来评估独特刺激特征之一(A)的有效显著性。结果发现,与仅预暴露于AX相比,预暴露于AX和BX后对A的厌恶更容易习得。然而,没有迹象表明对A的条件化速率受AX和BX呈现之间的时间间隔影响。这些发现挑战了刺激比较涉及一个负责增加独特刺激特征显著性的过程的观点,但可以由霍尔提出的显著性调节机制来解释[霍尔,G.,2003年。刺激表征敏感性的习得性变化:联想和非联想机制。《实验心理学季刊》56,43 - 55]。