Suppr超能文献

我们能否仅基于计算机断层扫描血管造影术来进行冠状动脉旁路移植术?与传统冠状动脉造影术的比较。

Can we perform coronary artery bypass grafting on the basis of computed tomographic angiography alone? A comparison with conventional coronary angiography.

作者信息

Bedi Harinder Singh, Gill Jeet Amol Singh, Bakshi Sandeep Singh

机构信息

Ludhiana Mediciti, Ferozpur Road, Ludhiana 142001, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr;33(4):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.039. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Multislice (64 slice) computed tomography (MSCT) angiography has recently emerged as a potential technique that can evaluate the coronaries in an accurate yet non-invasive manner. It has still not been shown whether the accuracy of the anatomy shown is precise enough to operate on the basis of MSCT alone. The aim of this prospective clinical trial is to compare MSCT to conventional coronary angiography (CCA), and to conclude whether MSCT alone is adequate for proceeding for CABG.

METHODS

50 patients with proven severe coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCA for elective CABG underwent MSCT prior to CABG. The MSCT images were compared with CCA and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of detecting significant stenosis cross checked. Lesion-by-lesion analysis was made. CCA was used as the reference standard for location and degree of stenosis.

RESULTS

An excellent correlation was found between the CCA and MSCT findings. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for quantitative assessment of stenosis >70% by MSCT compared to CCA were 98.5, 99.1, 82.3 and 99.8%, respectively. Comparing the maximal percent diameter luminal stenosis by MSCT versus CCA, the Pearson's correlation coefficient between the two modalities was 0.994 (p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean difference in percent stenosis of 0.05+/-2.42% (p=0.753). There was no significant correlation between stenosis difference and stenosis severity (Pearson's correlation coefficient=-0.027, p=0.695). 192 out of 207 (92.8%) of the observations were within +/-1.96 SD (4.8 to -4.7% stenosis difference).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved spatial and temporal resolution of the 64 row scanner provides an excellent correlation of MSCT with CCA. MSCT is a valuable tool in the armamentarium of the cardiac scientist. For the cardiac surgeon performing off pump CABG it helps in precise planning of the procedure and pre-judging the length of the conduit required. On the basis of our findings, in selected patients, we recommend the consideration of MSCT as a sole criteria for proceeding for CABG without CCA.

摘要

目的

多层(64层)计算机断层扫描(MSCT)血管造影术最近成为一种潜在技术,能够以准确且无创的方式评估冠状动脉情况。但目前仍未明确基于MSCT所显示的解剖结构准确性是否足以仅凭其进行手术操作。这项前瞻性临床试验的目的是将MSCT与传统冠状动脉造影(CCA)进行比较,并得出仅凭MSCT是否足以进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的结论。

方法

50例经CCA证实患有严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)且计划择期进行CABG的患者在手术前接受了MSCT检查。将MSCT图像与CCA图像进行比较,并对检测显著狭窄的准确性、敏感性和特异性进行交叉核对。进行逐病变分析。以CCA作为狭窄部位和程度的参考标准。

结果

CCA与MSCT的检查结果之间存在高度相关性。与CCA相比,MSCT对>70%狭窄进行定量评估的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性(PPV)和阴性(NPV)预测值分别为98.5%、99.1%、82.3%和99.8%。比较MSCT与CCA测得的最大管腔直径狭窄百分比,两种检查方式之间的Pearson相关系数为0.994(p<0.0001)。Bland-Altman分析显示狭窄百分比的平均差异为0.05±2.42%(p=0.753)。狭窄差异与狭窄严重程度之间无显著相关性(Pearson相关系数=-0.027,p=0.695)。207项观察结果中有192项(92.8%)在±1.96标准差范围内(狭窄差异为4.8%至-4.7%)。

结论

64排扫描仪在空间和时间分辨率上的提升使得MSCT与CCA具有高度相关性。MSCT是心脏科医生的一项重要工具。对于进行非体外循环CABG的心脏外科医生而言,它有助于精确规划手术并预先判断所需移植血管的长度。基于我们的研究结果,对于特定患者,我们建议考虑将MSCT作为无需进行CCA即可开展CABG的唯一标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验