Hoffmann Martin H K, Shi Heshui, Schmitz Bernd L, Schmid Florian T, Lieberknecht Michael, Schulze Ralph, Ludwig Bernd, Kroschel Ulf, Jahnke Norbert, Haerer Winfried, Brambs Hans-Juergen, Aschoff Andrik J
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
JAMA. 2005 May 25;293(20):2471-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.20.2471.
Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has recently evolved as a modality for noninvasive coronary imaging.
To assess the accuracy and robustness of MSCT vs the criterion standard of invasive coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, single-center study conducted in a referral center setting in Germany and enrolling 103 consecutive patients (mean age, 61.5 [SD, 9.7] years) from November 2003-August 2004 who were undergoing both invasive coronary angiography and MSCT using a scanner with 16 detector rows.
Blinded results for both modalities compared using the patient as the primary unit of analysis, with supplementary segment- and vessel-based analyses.
One thousand three hundred eighty-four segments (> or =1.5 mm diameter) were identified by invasive coronary angiography; nondiagnostic image quality of MSCT was identified for only 88 (6.4%) of these segments, mainly due to faster heart rates. Compared with invasive coronary angiography for detection of significant lesions (>50% stenosis), segment-based sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MSCT were 95%, 98%, 87%, and 99%, respectively. Quantitative comparison of MSCT and invasive coronary angiography showed good correlation (r = 0.87, P<.001), with MSCT systematically measuring greater-percentage stenoses (bias, +12%). In the patient-based analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.00), indicating high discriminative power to identify patients who might be candidates for revascularization (>50% left main artery stenosis and/or >70% stenosis in any other epicardial vessel). Threshold optimization allowed either detection of these patients with 100% sensitivity at a reasonable false-positive rate (specificity, 76.5%; MSCT stenosis, >66%) or optimization of both the sensitivity and specificity (>90%; MSCT stenosis, >76%).
Multislice computed tomography provides high accuracy for noninvasive detection of suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. This promising technology has potential to complement diagnostic invasive coronary angiography in routine clinical care.
多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)最近已发展成为一种用于无创冠状动脉成像的方式。
评估MSCT与有创冠状动脉造影这一标准检测方法相比,在检测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病方面的准确性和可靠性。
设计、地点和患者:在德国一家转诊中心进行的前瞻性单中心研究,纳入了2003年11月至2004年8月连续103例患者(平均年龄61.5[标准差9.7]岁),这些患者同时接受了有创冠状动脉造影和使用16排探测器扫描仪的MSCT检查。
以患者作为主要分析单位,对两种检查方法的盲法结果进行比较,并进行基于节段和血管的补充分析。
有创冠状动脉造影识别出1384个节段(直径≥1.5mm);其中仅88个(6.4%)节段的MSCT图像质量无法诊断,主要原因是心率较快。与有创冠状动脉造影检测显著病变(狭窄>50%)相比,MSCT基于节段的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为95%、98%、87%和99%。MSCT与有创冠状动脉造影的定量比较显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.87,P<0.001),MSCT系统性地测量出更高百分比的狭窄(偏差,+12%)。在基于患者的分析中,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.97(95%置信区间,0.90 - 1.00),表明在识别可能适合血运重建的患者(左主干动脉狭窄>50%和/或任何其他心外膜血管狭窄>70%)方面具有较高的鉴别能力。阈值优化可在合理的假阳性率下以100%的敏感性检测到这些患者(特异性,76.5%;MSCT狭窄,>66%),或同时优化敏感性和特异性(>90%;MSCT狭窄,>76%)。
多层螺旋计算机断层扫描在无创检测疑似阻塞性冠状动脉疾病方面具有很高的准确性。这项有前景的技术有潜力在常规临床护理中补充诊断性有创冠状动脉造影。