Bedor D C G, Gonçalves T M, Ferreira M L L, de Sousa C E M, Menezes A L, Oliveira E J, de Santana D P
Núcleo de Desenvolvimento Farmacêutico e Cosmético, Rua Professor Arthur de Sá s/n, Cidade Universitária, CEP 50740-520, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008 Feb 15;863(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.12.027. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
The comparison of two methods based on online solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography with UV (SPE-LC-UV) or mass spectrometry detection (SPE-LC-MS/MS) for the simultaneous quantification of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) and trimethoprim (TMP) is presented. The methods were validated and proved to be accurate. The analysis of standard samples for SMZ at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5, 25 and 50microg/mL demonstrated a relative standard deviation of less than 6% for both methods (n=18), while TMP samples at concentrations of 0.05, 0.15, 1.5 and 5.0microg/mL were analyzed with R.S.D. of less than 4% (n=18). The method with mass spectrometric detection was approximately six times more sensitive than the method with ultraviolet detection. The total run time for the SPE-LC-MS/MS was 2.5min per sample as opposed to 18.0min for the SPE-LC-UV method. The method with MS detection in comparison with UV detection proved to be more rugged and was successfully applied to pharmacokinetics studies.
本文介绍了两种基于在线固相萃取-液相色谱联用紫外检测(SPE-LC-UV)或质谱检测(SPE-LC-MS/MS)同时定量磺胺甲恶唑(SMZ)和甲氧苄啶(TMP)的方法的比较。这些方法经过验证,证明是准确的。对浓度为0.5、1.5、25和50μg/mL的SMZ标准样品进行分析,两种方法的相对标准偏差均小于6%(n=18),而对浓度为0.05、0.15、1.5和5.0μg/mL的TMP样品进行分析时,相对标准偏差小于4%(n=18)。质谱检测方法的灵敏度约为紫外检测方法的六倍。SPE-LC-MS/MS每个样品的总运行时间为2.5分钟,而SPE-LC-UV方法为18.0分钟。与紫外检测相比,质谱检测方法更耐用,并成功应用于药代动力学研究。