Hansen Matthew L, Otis James C, Johnson Jared S, Cordasco Frank A, Craig Edward V, Warren Russell F
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):316-25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00880.
Some individuals with massive rotator cuff tears maintain active shoulder abduction, and some maintain good postoperative active range of motion despite high rates of repeat tears after repair. We devised a biomechanical rationale for these observations and measured the increases in residual muscle forces necessary to maintain active shoulder motion with rotator cuff tears of various sizes.
A custom cadaver shoulder controller utilizing position and orientation closed-loop feedback control was used. Six cadaver glenohumeral joint specimens were tested in open-chain scapular plane abduction with equivalent upper extremity weight. The shoulder controller limited superior translation of the humeral head to 3.0 mm while maintaining neutral axial rotation by automatically controlling individual rotator cuff forces. Three-dimensional position and orientation and rotator cuff and deltoid force vectors were recorded. Specimens were tested with an intact rotator cuff and with 6, 7, and 8-cm tears.
All six specimens achieved full abduction with <or=3.0 mm of superior translation of the humeral head for all rotator cuff tear sizes. The effect of rotator cuff tear was significant for all tear sizes (p < 0.01). Compared with the intact condition, the subscapularis force requirements for the 6, 7, and 8-cm tears were increased by 30%, 44%, and 85%, respectively. For the combined infraspinatus and teres minor, the forces were increased by 32%, 45%, and 86%, respectively. The maximum deltoid force for the simulated tear condition never exceeded the deltoid force required at maximum abduction for the intact condition. However, between 10 degrees and 45 degrees of abduction, the average deltoid force requirement increased 22%, 28%, and 45% for the three tear sizes.
In the presence of a massive rotator cuff tear, stable glenohumeral abduction without excessive superior humeral head translation requires significantly higher forces in the remaining intact portion of the rotator cuff. These force increases are within the physiologic range of rotator cuff muscles for 6-cm tears and most 7-cm tears. Increases in deltoid force requirements occur in early abduction; however, greater relative increases are required of the rotator cuff, especially in the presence of larger rotator cuff tears.
一些患有巨大肩袖撕裂的个体仍能保持主动肩关节外展,且一些患者尽管修复后再次撕裂的发生率很高,但术后仍能保持良好的主动活动范围。我们为这些观察结果设计了一个生物力学原理,并测量了维持不同大小肩袖撕裂时肩关节主动活动所需的残余肌力增加情况。
使用一种采用位置和方向闭环反馈控制的定制尸体肩部控制器。对六个尸体盂肱关节标本进行了开链肩胛平面外展测试,并施加等效的上肢重量。肩部控制器通过自动控制各个肩袖力,将肱骨头的上移限制在3.0毫米以内,同时保持中立的轴向旋转。记录三维位置和方向以及肩袖和三角肌的力矢量。对标本进行完整肩袖以及6厘米、7厘米和8厘米撕裂的测试。
对于所有肩袖撕裂大小,所有六个标本均实现了肱骨头向上平移≤3.0毫米的完全外展。所有撕裂大小的肩袖撕裂影响均具有显著性(p<0.01)。与完整状态相比,6厘米、7厘米和8厘米撕裂时肩胛下肌的力需求分别增加了30%、44%和85%。对于冈下肌和小圆肌的合力,分别增加了32%、45%和86%。模拟撕裂状态下的最大三角肌力从未超过完整状态下最大外展时所需的三角肌力。然而,在10度至45度外展之间,三种撕裂大小的平均三角肌力需求分别增加了22%、28%和45%。
在存在巨大肩袖撕裂的情况下,要实现稳定的盂肱关节外展且肱骨头不过度向上平移,需要在肩袖剩余的完整部分施加明显更高的力。对于6厘米撕裂和大多数7厘米撕裂,这些力的增加在肩袖肌肉的生理范围内。三角肌力需求在早期外展时增加;然而,肩袖需要更大的相对增加量,尤其是在存在较大肩袖撕裂的情况下。