Suppr超能文献

三角肌和肩袖肌肉在动态肩部外展过程中的关系:肩袖撕裂进展的生物力学研究。

Relationship Between Deltoid and Rotator Cuff Muscles During Dynamic Shoulder Abduction: A Biomechanical Study of Rotator Cuff Tear Progression.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1919-1926. doi: 10.1177/0363546518768276. Epub 2018 May 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous biomechanical studies regarding deltoid function during glenohumeral abduction have primarily used static testing protocols.

HYPOTHESES

(1) Deltoid forces required for scapular plane abduction increase as simulated rotator cuff tears become larger, and (2) maximal abduction decreases despite increased deltoid forces.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with a mean age of 67 years (range, 64-74 years) were used. The supraspinatus and anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid tendons were attached to individual shoulder simulator actuators. Deltoid forces and maximum abduction were recorded for the following tear patterns: intact, isolated subscapularis (SSC), isolated supraspinatus (SSP), anterosuperior (SSP + SSC), posterosuperior (infraspinatus [ISP] + SSP), and massive (SSC + SSP + ISP). Optical triads tracked 3-dimensional motion during dynamic testing. Fluoroscopy and computed tomography were used to measure critical shoulder angle, acromial index, and superior humeral head migration with massive tears. Mean values for maximum glenohumeral abduction and deltoid forces were determined. Linear mixed-effects regression examined changes in motion and forces over time. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients ( r) among deltoid forces, critical shoulder angles, and acromial indices were calculated.

RESULTS

Shoulders with an intact cuff required 193.8 N (95% CI, 125.5 to 262.1) total deltoid force to achieve 79.8° (95% CI, 66.4° to 93.2°) of maximum glenohumeral abduction. Compared with native shoulders, abduction decreased after simulated SSP (-27.2%; 95% CI, -43.3% to -11.1%, P = .04), anterosuperior (-51.5%; 95% CI, -70.2% to -32.8%, P < .01), and massive (-48.4%; 95% CI, -65.2% to -31.5%, P < .01) cuff tears. Increased total deltoid forces were required for simulated anterosuperior (+108.1%; 95% CI, 68.7% to 147.5%, P < .01) and massive (+57.2%; 95% CI, 19.6% to 94.7%, P = .05) cuff tears. Anterior deltoid forces were significantly greater in anterosuperior ( P < .01) and massive ( P = .03) tears. Middle deltoid forces were greater with anterosuperior tears ( P = .03). Posterior deltoid forces were greater with anterosuperior ( P = .02) and posterosuperior ( P = .04) tears. Anterior deltoid force was negatively correlated ( r = -0.89, P = .01) with critical shoulder angle (34.3°; 95% CI, 32.0° to 36.6°). Deltoid forces had no statistical correlation with acromial index (0.55; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.61). Superior migration was 8.3 mm (95% CI, 5.5 to 11.1 mm) during testing of massive rotator cuff tears.

CONCLUSION

Shoulders with rotator cuff tears require considerable compensatory deltoid function to prevent abduction motion loss. Anterosuperior tears resulted in the largest motion loss despite the greatest increase in deltoid force.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Rotator cuff tears place more strain on the deltoid to prevent abduction motion loss. Fatigue or injury to the deltoid may result in a precipitous decline in abduction, regardless of tear size.

摘要

背景

先前有关肩盂肱关节外展时三角肌功能的生物力学研究主要使用静态测试方案。

假说

(1)随着模拟肩袖撕裂变得更大,肩胛平面外展所需的三角肌力增加,(2)尽管三角肌力增加,但最大外展减少。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

使用 12 个平均年龄为 67 岁(范围,64-74 岁)的新鲜冷冻尸体肩部。冈上肌和前、中、后三角肌肌腱分别附着在单独的肩部模拟器致动器上。记录以下撕裂模式的三角肌力和最大外展:完整、孤立的肩胛下肌(SSC)、孤立的冈上肌(SSP)、前上(SSP+SSC)、后上(冈下肌[ISP]+SSP)和巨大(SSC+SSP+ISP)。在动态测试过程中,光学三联体跟踪三维运动。使用荧光透视和计算机断层扫描测量有巨大撕裂的关键肩部角度、肩峰指数和肱骨头上移。确定最大盂肱关节外展和三角肌力的平均值。线性混合效应回归检验随时间变化的运动和力的变化。计算三角肌力、关键肩部角度和肩峰指数之间的皮尔逊积矩相关系数(r)。

结果

肩袖完整的肩部需要 193.8 N(95%CI,125.5 至 262.1)的总三角肌力来实现 79.8°(95%CI,66.4°至 93.2°)的最大盂肱关节外展。与天然肩部相比,模拟 SSP(-27.2%;95%CI,-43.3%至-11.1%,P=.04)、前上(-51.5%;95%CI,-70.2%至-32.8%,P<.01)和巨大(-48.4%;95%CI,-65.2%至-31.5%,P<.01)肩袖撕裂后外展减少。模拟前上(+108.1%;95%CI,68.7%至 147.5%,P<.01)和巨大(+57.2%;95%CI,19.6%至 94.7%,P=.05)肩袖撕裂时需要更大的总三角肌力。在前上(P<.01)和巨大(P=.03)撕裂中,前三角肌力显著更大。前上撕裂时,中三角肌力更大(P=.03)。后三角肌力在前上(P=.02)和后上(P=.04)撕裂时更大。前三角肌力与关键肩部角度(34.3°;95%CI,32.0°至 36.6°)呈负相关(r=-0.89,P=.01)。三角肌力与肩峰指数无统计学相关性(0.55;95%CI,0.48 至 0.61)。在巨大肩袖撕裂的测试中,肱骨头上移 8.3 mm(95%CI,5.5 至 11.1 mm)。

结论

肩袖撕裂的肩部需要相当大的代偿三角肌功能来防止外展运动丧失。尽管三角肌力增加最大,但前上撕裂导致最大运动损失。

临床意义

肩袖撕裂会增加三角肌的应变,以防止外展运动丧失。三角肌的疲劳或损伤可能导致外展急剧下降,无论撕裂大小如何。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验