Hosalkar Harish S, Sankar Wudbhav N, Wills Brian P D, Goebel Jennifer, Dormans John P, Drummond Denis S
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2nd Floor Wood Building, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):337-48. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00014.
The developmental anatomy and biomechanics of the upper cervical spine are unique in children. Congenital osseous anomalies in this region may be associated with an increased risk for subsequent neurological compromise from instability and/or spinal cord encroachment. We performed a double-cohort study evaluating congenital osseous anomalies of the upper cervical spine in children who presented with one or more clinical problems, and we attempted to outline the risk of possible neurological compromise.
We reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of all children seen and treated for osseous anomalies of the upper cervical spine at our institution between 1988 and 2003. Patients were divided into two cohorts on the basis of the presence or absence of associated syndromes. Parameters reviewed included demographic data, clinical presentation, and imaging features. All anomalies involving the central nervous system, the occipitocervical junction, and the upper cervical osseous canal were included. Complicating sequelae such as canal stenosis, segmental instability, and other anomalies of the central nervous system and spine were identified.
Sixty-eight consecutive children were identified. Twenty-one patients had an underlying described syndrome. There were 234 osseous anomalies (average, 3.4 per patient). Three or more anomalies were noted in 79% of the patients. There was no significant difference in the mean number of anomalies (p = 0.80) or in the frequency of any specific anomaly (p > 0.20 for all) between syndromic and nonsyndromic patients. The variety of clinical presentations included neck pain (twenty-six patients), neurological changes (twenty-one patients), and torticollis and/or stiffness (twenty-one patients). Twenty-three patients had more than one complaint. Six patients had isolated spinal instability, twenty-eight had isolated spinal cord encroachment, and six had a combination of both. Forty-four (65%) of the sixty-eight patients underwent surgical decompression and/or arthrodesis principally focused from the foramen magnum to the second cervical vertebra.
As a result of these findings, we recommend a thorough evaluation and advanced imaging of the upper cervical spine in all children who present with symptoms related to the upper cervical spine, to identify associated anomalies and further define the nature of canal encroachment including any potential for neurologic compromise.
儿童上颈椎的发育解剖学和生物力学具有独特性。该区域的先天性骨异常可能与因不稳定和/或脊髓受压导致的后续神经功能损害风险增加有关。我们进行了一项双队列研究,评估出现一个或多个临床问题的儿童上颈椎先天性骨异常情况,并试图概述可能发生神经功能损害的风险。
我们回顾了1988年至2003年间在我们机构就诊并接受上颈椎骨异常治疗的所有儿童的病历和影像学研究。根据是否存在相关综合征将患者分为两个队列。审查的参数包括人口统计学数据、临床表现和影像学特征。纳入所有涉及中枢神经系统、枕颈交界处和上颈椎管的异常情况。识别出诸如椎管狭窄、节段性不稳定以及中枢神经系统和脊柱的其他异常等并发症后遗症。
共确定了68名连续的儿童。21名患者有潜在的所述综合征。共有234处骨异常(平均每名患者3.4处)。79%的患者有三处或更多异常。综合征患者和非综合征患者之间的平均异常数量(p = 0.80)或任何特定异常的频率(所有p > 0.20)均无显著差异。临床表现多样,包括颈部疼痛(26例患者)、神经功能改变(21例患者)以及斜颈和/或僵硬(21例患者)。23例患者有不止一项主诉。6例患者有孤立性脊柱不稳定,28例有孤立性脊髓受压,6例两者兼有。68例患者中有44例(65%)主要接受了从枕骨大孔到第二颈椎的手术减压和/或关节融合术。
基于这些发现,我们建议对所有出现与上颈椎相关症状的儿童进行上颈椎的全面评估和高级影像学检查,以识别相关异常并进一步明确椎管受压的性质,包括任何神经功能损害的可能性。