Flores Gabriela, Krishnakumar Jaya, O'Donnell Owen, van Doorslaer Eddy
Department of Econometrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Health Econ. 2008 Dec;17(12):1393-412. doi: 10.1002/hec.1338.
In the absence of formal health insurance, we argue that the strategies households adopt to finance health care have important implications for the measurement and interpretation of how health payments impact on consumption and poverty. Given data on source of finance, we propose to (a) approximate the relative impact of health payments on current consumption with a 'coping'-adjusted health expenditure ratio, (b) uncover poverty that is 'hidden' because total household expenditure is inflated by financial coping strategies and (c) identify poverty that is 'transient' because necessary consumption is temporarily sacrificed to pay for health care. Measures that ignore coping strategies not only overstate the risk to current consumption and exaggerate the scale of catastrophic payments but also overlook the long-run burden of health payments. Nationally representative data from India reveal that coping strategies finance as much as three-quarters of the cost of inpatient care. Payments for inpatient care exceed 10% of total household expenditure for around 30% of hospitalized households but less than 4% sacrifice more than 10% of current consumption to accommodate this spending.Ignoring health payments leads to underestimate poverty by 7-8% points among hospitalized households; 80% of this adjustment is hidden poverty due to coping.
在缺乏正规医疗保险的情况下,我们认为家庭用于支付医疗保健费用所采取的策略对于衡量和解读医疗支付如何影响消费及贫困状况具有重要意义。基于融资来源的数据,我们建议:(a) 用经 “应对措施” 调整后的医疗支出比率来估算医疗支付对当前消费的相对影响;(b) 揭示因家庭总支出因金融应对策略而虚增从而 “隐藏” 的贫困状况;(c) 识别因为支付医疗保健费用而暂时牺牲必要消费从而 “暂时” 陷入的贫困状况。忽视应对策略的措施不仅高估了对当前消费的风险、夸大了灾难性支付的规模,还忽视了医疗支付的长期负担。来自印度的全国代表性数据显示,应对策略承担了高达四分之三的住院治疗费用。约30% 的住院家庭的住院治疗费用超过家庭总支出的10%,但只有不到4% 的家庭为了支付这笔费用而牺牲超过10% 的当前消费。忽视医疗支付会导致低估住院家庭的贫困率7至8个百分点;其中80% 的调整幅度是由于应对措施导致的隐藏贫困。