Lewinsohn Thomas M, Roslin Tomas
Laboratório Interações Insetos-Plantas, Depto. Zoologia, IB, UNICAMP, Campinas 13083-970, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ecol Lett. 2008 Apr;11(4):398-416. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01155.x. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
Most multicellular species alive are tropical arthropods associated with plants. Hence, the host-specificity of these species, and their diversity at different scales, are keys to understanding the assembly structure of global biodiversity. We present a comprehensive scheme in which tropical herbivore megadiversity can be partitioned into the following components: (A) more host plant species per se, (B) more arthropod species per plant species, (C) higher host specificity of herbivores, or (D) higher species turnover (beta diversity) in the tropics than in the temperate zone. We scrutinize recent studies addressing each component and identify methodological differences among them. We find substantial support for the importance of component A, more tropical host species. A meta-analysis of published results reveals intermediate to high correlations between plant and herbivore diversity, accounting for up to 60% of the variation in insect species richness. Support for other factors is mixed, with studies too scarce and approaches too uneven to allow for quantitative summaries. More research on individual components is unlikely to resolve their relative contribution to overall herbivore diversity. Instead, we call for the adoption of more coherent methods that avoid pitfalls for larger-scale comparisons, for studies assessing different components together rather than singly, and for studies that investigate herbivore beta-diversity (component D) in a more comprehensive perspective.
现存的大多数多细胞物种是与植物相关的热带节肢动物。因此,这些物种的宿主特异性及其在不同尺度上的多样性,是理解全球生物多样性组装结构的关键。我们提出了一个综合方案,其中热带食草动物的巨大多样性可分为以下几个组成部分:(A)本身有更多的宿主植物物种,(B)每个植物物种有更多的节肢动物物种,(C)食草动物具有更高的宿主特异性,或(D)热带地区比温带地区有更高的物种周转率(β多样性)。我们仔细研究了针对每个组成部分的近期研究,并确定了它们之间的方法差异。我们发现有大量证据支持组成部分A(更多的热带宿主物种)的重要性。对已发表结果的荟萃分析揭示了植物和食草动物多样性之间存在中等至高的相关性,占昆虫物种丰富度变化的比例高达60%。对其他因素的支持参差不齐,研究太少且方法过于不一致,无法进行定量总结。对各个组成部分进行更多研究不太可能解决它们对整体食草动物多样性的相对贡献。相反,我们呼吁采用更连贯的方法,避免大规模比较中的陷阱,进行评估不同组成部分而非单独评估的研究,并从更全面的角度研究食草动物的β多样性(组成部分D)。