Lopes Neuza Helena, Paulitsch Felipe da Silva, Gois Aécio F, Pereira Alexandre C, Stolf Noedir A, Dallan Luis Oliveira, Ramires José A F, Hueb Whady A
Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Mar;33(3):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
To evaluate whether the number of vessels disease has an impact on clinical outcomes as well as on therapeutic results accordingly to medical, percutaneous, or surgery treatment in chronic coronary artery disease.
We evaluated 825 individuals enrolled in MASS study, a randomized study to compare treatment options for single or multivessel coronary artery disease with preserved left ventricular function, prospectively followed during 5 years. The incidence of overall mortality and the composite end-point of death, myocardial infarction, and refractory angina were compared in three groups: single vessel disease (SVD n=214), two-vessel disease (2VD n=253) and three-vessel disease (3VD n=358). The relationship between baseline variables and the composite end-point was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards survival model.
Most baseline characteristics were similar among groups, except age (younger in SVD and older in 3VD, p<0.001), lower incidence of hypertension in SVD (p<0.0001), and lower levels of total and LDL-cholesterol in 3VD (p=0.004 and p=0.005, respectively). There were no statistical differences in composite end-point in 5 years among groups independent of the kind of treatment; however, there was a higher mortality rate in 3VD (p<0.001). When we stratified our analysis for each treatment option, bypass surgery was associated with a lower number of composite end-point in all groups (SVD p<0.001, 2VD p=0.002, 3VD p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, we found higher mortality risk in 3VD comparing to SVD (p=0.005, HR 3.14, 95%CI 1.4-7.0).
Three-vessel disease was associated with worse prognosis compared to single- or two-vessel disease in patients with stable coronary disease and preserved ventricular function at 5-year follow-up. In addition, event-free survival rates were higher after bypass surgery, independent of the number of vessels diseased in these subsets of patients.
评估血管病变数量是否会对慢性冠状动脉疾病患者的临床结局以及药物、经皮或手术治疗的疗效产生影响。
我们评估了纳入MASS研究的825名个体,这是一项随机研究,旨在比较单支或多支冠状动脉疾病且左心室功能保留患者的治疗方案,并对其进行了为期5年的前瞻性随访。比较了三组患者的总死亡率以及死亡、心肌梗死和难治性心绞痛的复合终点发生率:单支血管病变组(SVD,n = 214)、两支血管病变组(2VD,n = 253)和三支血管病变组(3VD,n = 358)。使用Cox比例风险生存模型评估基线变量与复合终点之间的关系。
除年龄外(SVD组患者年龄较轻,3VD组患者年龄较大,p < 0.001),各组间大多数基线特征相似;SVD组高血压发病率较低(p < 0.0001);3VD组总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较低(分别为p = 0.004和p = 0.005)。无论治疗类型如何,各组间5年复合终点无统计学差异;然而,3VD组死亡率较高(p < 0.001)。当我们对每种治疗方案进行分层分析时,搭桥手术在所有组中复合终点数量均较低(SVD组p < 0.001,2VD组p = 0.002,3VD组p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,与SVD组相比,3VD组死亡风险更高(p = 0.005,HR 3.14,95%CI 1.4 - 7.0)。
在5年随访中,对于稳定型冠心病且心室功能保留的患者,三支血管病变与单支或两支血管病变相比,预后更差。此外,搭桥手术后无事件生存率更高,与这些亚组患者的血管病变数量无关。