Suppr超能文献

与年龄匹配的正常反应者相比,低反应者的早期临床妊娠丢失率没有变化。

Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders.

作者信息

Kumbak Banu, Ulug Ulun, Erzik Burcak, Akbas Hande, Bahceci Mustafa

机构信息

Umut IVF Center, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2009 Jan;91(1):106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.009. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the early clinical pregnancy loss rate (ECPLR) of singleton gestations in poor responder (PR) patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Private assisted reproductive technology center.

PATIENT(S): A total of 2,157 singleton clinical pregnancies were identified, 195 from PR and 1,962 from normoresponder (NR) patients. Poor response was accepted as retrieval of four or fewer oocytes. Patients who yielded more than five oocytes were accepted as NR control group.

INTERVENTION(S): Patients were age stratified as <or=35, 36-39, and >or=40 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparative evaluation of ECPLR in PR and NR patients according to age.

RESULTS

Out of 195 singleton clinical pregnancies achieved in poor responders, 31% resulted in early clinical pregnancy loss; ECPLR were 22%, 32%, and 59% in the <or=35, 36-39, and >or=40 year age groups, respectively. When ECPLR in singleton gestations of PR patients was compared with that of NR patients according to age, no significant differences were found for all age groups.

CONCLUSION(S): Early clinical pregnancy loss rate was not found to differ significantly between PR and NR patients at all age groups. Therefore, PR patients should be counseled about their lower probability of clinical pregnancy but similar ECPLR compared with their age-matched NR counterparts.

摘要

目的

探讨低反应(PR)患者单胎妊娠的早期临床妊娠丢失率(ECPLR)。

设计

一项回顾性研究。

地点

私立辅助生殖技术中心。

患者

共确定2157例单胎临床妊娠,其中195例来自PR患者,1962例来自正常反应(NR)患者。低反应定义为获取4个或更少卵母细胞。获取超过5个卵母细胞的患者作为NR对照组。

干预措施

患者按年龄分层为≤35岁、36 - 39岁和≥40岁。

主要观察指标

根据年龄对PR和NR患者的ECPLR进行比较评估。

结果

在低反应者实现的195例单胎临床妊娠中,31%导致早期临床妊娠丢失;≤35岁、36 - 39岁和≥40岁年龄组的ECPLR分别为22%、32%和59%。当按年龄将PR患者单胎妊娠的ECPLR与NR患者的进行比较时,所有年龄组均未发现显著差异。

结论

在所有年龄组中,PR和NR患者的早期临床妊娠丢失率均未发现显著差异。因此,应向PR患者咨询其临床妊娠概率较低但与年龄匹配的NR患者相比ECPLR相似的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验