Suppr超能文献

按形态类型和严重程度划分的口腔裂隙家族风险:基于人群的一级亲属队列研究

Familial risk of oral clefts by morphological type and severity: population based cohort study of first degree relatives.

作者信息

Sivertsen Ase, Wilcox Allen J, Skjaerven Rolv, Vindenes Hallvard Andreas, Abyholm Frank, Harville Emily, Lie Rolv Terje

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, No-5021 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):432-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39458.563611.AE. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the relative risk of recurrence of oral cleft in first degree relatives in relation to cleft morphology.

DESIGN

Population based cohort study.

SETTING

Data from the medical birth registry of Norway linked with clinical data on virtually all cleft patients treated in Norway over a 35 year period.

PARTICIPANTS

2.1 million children born in Norway between 1967 and 2001, 4138 of whom were treated for an oral cleft.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Relative risk of recurrence of isolated clefts from parent to child and between full siblings, for anatomic subgroups of clefts.

RESULTS

Among first degree relatives, the relative risk of recurrence of cleft was 32 (95% confidence interval 24.6 to 40.3) for any cleft lip and 56 (37.2 to 84.8) for cleft palate only (P difference=0.02). The risk of clefts among children of affected mothers and affected fathers was similar. Risks of recurrence were also similar for parent-offspring and sibling-sibling pairs. The "crossover" risk between any cleft lip and cleft palate only was 3.0 (1.3 to 6.7). The severity of the primary case was unrelated to the risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The stronger family recurrence of cleft palate only suggests a larger genetic component for cleft palate only than for any cleft lip. The weaker risk of crossover between the two types of cleft indicates relatively distinct causes. The similarity of mother-offspring, father-offspring, and sibling-sibling risks is consistent with genetic risk that works chiefly through fetal genes. Anatomical severity does not affect the recurrence risk in first degree relatives, which argues against a multifactorial threshold model of causation.

摘要

目的

评估一级亲属中唇腭裂复发的相对风险与腭裂形态的关系。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

背景

来自挪威医疗出生登记处的数据与挪威在35年期间几乎所有接受治疗的腭裂患者的临床数据相关联。

参与者

1967年至2001年在挪威出生的210万儿童,其中4138人接受了唇腭裂治疗。

主要观察指标

父母与子女以及全同胞之间孤立性腭裂复发的相对风险,针对腭裂的解剖学亚组。

结果

在一级亲属中,任何唇裂的复发相对风险为32(95%置信区间24.6至40.3),仅腭裂的复发相对风险为56(37.2至84.8)(P值差异=0.02)。受影响母亲和受影响父亲的子女患腭裂的风险相似。父母与子女以及同胞与同胞对之间的复发风险也相似。任何唇裂与仅腭裂之间的“交叉”风险为3.0(1.3至6.7)。原发病例的严重程度与复发风险无关。

结论

仅腭裂更强的家族复发表明仅腭裂的遗传成分比任何唇裂更大。两种腭裂类型之间较弱的交叉风险表明病因相对不同。母亲与子女、父亲与子女以及同胞与同胞风险的相似性与主要通过胎儿基因起作用的遗传风险一致。解剖学严重程度不影响一级亲属的复发风险,这与多因素阈值病因模型相悖。

相似文献

3
The impact of family history of non-syndromic oral clefts on their incidence in pregnancy.非综合征性口腔腭裂家族史对其孕期发病率的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Apr;35(8):1523-1526. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1759539. Epub 2020 May 5.

引用本文的文献

5
Epidemiologic trends of cleft lip and/or palate in Switzerland.瑞士唇腭裂的流行病学趋势。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05500-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of major anatomic variations in oral clefts.口腔裂隙主要解剖变异的患病率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Feb;121(2):587-595. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000297839.78179.f5.
8
Genetics of nonsyndromic oral clefts revisited.非综合征性口腔颌面部裂隙的遗传学再探讨。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Sep;33(5):406-17. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0406_gonocr_2.3.co_2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验